Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
SCG10-related neuronal growth-associated proteins in neural development, plasticity, degeneration, and aging
Mori N, Morii H.. Journal of neuroscience research, 2002-11-01
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Neuronal growth-associated proteins (nGAPs) are in general neuron-specific gene products whose expression correlates tightly with neuronal process outgrowth and/or regeneration, and are mostly good downstream targets of neurotrophin stimulation. Expression of genes encoding nGAPs such as GAP-43, SCG10, and stathmin is upregulated following lesioning of cortical and hippocampal regions of the adult rat brain. In the brains of aged animals, however, the magnitude of the response is reduced, whereas the time course of the response is mostly unchanged when compared with that for brains of young ones. Expression of GAP-43 and stathmin is reduced by aging, and is also changed in age-related neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease in humans. Certain nGAPs are induced during long-term potentiation (LTP) and also during critical periods of song-learning and ocular dominance column formation in birds and cats, respectively. Recent evidence further supports the idea that functional synaptic modulation is often associated with remodeling of synaptic structures. These results suggest that neurotrophin-responsive nGAPs serve as molecular markers of neuronal plasticity during development and aging, and that the neuronal plasticity decreases, at least in certain neuronal circuits, in the aged brain and neurodegenerative diseases. Recent findings on the roles of stathmin and SCG10-related proteins in microtubule destabilization and its functional block by phosphorylation further support the importance of the SCG10 family proteins in neuronal cytoskeletal regulation, particularly as to microtubule dynamics. We summarize here a decade of research on SCG10 and its related molecules with special interests to brain aging and disease.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Mori, N., & Morii, H. (2002). SCG10-related neuronal growth-associated proteins in neural development, plasticity, degeneration, and aging. Journal of neuroscience research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10353
Vancouver
Mori N, Morii H. SCG10-related neuronal growth-associated proteins in neural development, plasticity, degeneration, and aging. Journal of neuroscience research. 2002. doi:10.1002/jnr.10353. PMID: 12391585.
BibTeX
@article{mori2002-12391585,
author = {Mori, N. and Morii, H.},
title = {{SCG10-related neuronal growth-associated proteins in neural development, plasticity, degeneration, and aging}},
journal = {Journal of neuroscience research},
year = {2002},
doi = {10.1002/jnr.10353},
pmid = {12391585},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.10353}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- In the brains of aged animals, however, the magnitude of the response is reduced, whereas the time course of the response is mostly unchanged when compared with that for brains of young ones.
- Recent evidence further supports the idea that functional synaptic modulation is often associated with remodeling of synaptic structures.
- These results suggest that neurotrophin-responsive nGAPs serve as molecular markers of neuronal plasticity during development and aging, and that the neuronal plasticity decreases, at least in certain neuronal circuits, in the aged brain and neurodegenerative diseases.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of neuroscience research) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2002 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12391585) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Brain scans and imaging
Also tagged “neural”
4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “neural”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.