Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 64 out of 100. How common it is

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Plain-language summary

Context Twin studies using selected samples have shown high heritability for Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective To evaluate genetic and environmental influences on AD in a fully ascertained population of older twins, including like- and unlike-sex pairs. Design Five-group quantitative genetic model: male monozygotic twins, female monozygotic twins, male dizygotic twins, female dizygotic twins, and unlike-sex twins. Setting and participants All twins in the Swedish Twin Registry aged 65 years and older. The study included 11,884 twin pairs, among whom were 392 pairs in which 1 or both members had AD. Main outcome measures All individuals were screened for cognitive dysfunction. Suspected cases of dementia and their co-twins received complete clinical diagnostic evaluations for AD. Estimates of heritability, shared environmental influences, and nonshared environmental influences, adjusting for age, were derived from the twin data. Results Heritability for AD was estimated to be 58% in the full model and 79% in the best-fitting model, with the balance of variation explained by nonshared environmental influences. There were no significant differences between men and women in prevalence or heritability after controlling for age. Within pairs concordant for AD, intrapair difference in age at onset was significantly greater in dizygotic than in monozygotic pairs, suggesting genetic influences on timing of the disease. Conclusions In the largest twin study to date, we confirmed that heritability for AD is high and that the same genetic factors are influential for both men and women. However, nongenetic risk factors also play an important role and might be the focus for interventions to reduce disease risk or delay disease onset.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Gatz, M., Reynolds, C. A., Fratiglioni, L., Johansson, B., Mortimer, J. A., Berg, S., et al. (2006). Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. Archives of general psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.168

Vancouver

Gatz M, Reynolds CA, Fratiglioni L, Johansson B, Mortimer JA, Berg S, et al. Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. Archives of general psychiatry. 2006. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.168. PMID: 16461860.

BibTeX

@article{gatz2006-16461860,
  author  = {Gatz, M. and Reynolds, C. A. and Fratiglioni, L. and Johansson, B. and Mortimer, J. A. and Berg, S. and Fiske, A. and Pedersen, N. L.},
  title   = {{Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease}},
  journal = {Archives of general psychiatry},
  year    = {2006},
  doi     = {10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.168},
  pmid    = {16461860},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.168}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In all twins aged 65 and over in the Swedish Twin Registry (11,884 pairs, 392 with Alzheimer's in one or both twins), genetic differences accounted for an estimated 58% to 79% of the variation in who developed Alzheimer's, depending on the model. The rest was attributed to environmental factors not shared by twins. Heritability did not differ significantly between men and women, and the timing of onset also appeared to be partly genetic. These are population-level estimates from one country, not a measure of any individual's risk, and the study does not identify genes or test any treatment.

Study details

How this study scored 64/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 7 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 5 of 6; Still being cited 4 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 64 of 100.64 of 100 points earned36 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Archives of general psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Archives of General Psychiatry: journal h-index 543 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2006 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 4 / 4 11,884 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 7 / 7 Cited 1,804 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 82.0 citations a year over 22 year(s) since 2006
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 28.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 5 / 6 Cited by 102 other studies in this library
Still being cited 4 / 4 Cited 325 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Nancy L. Pedersen: h-index 167 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Southern California: institution h-index 1,521 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 16461860)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 64 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

102 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in How common it is from nearby years

Also in How common it is

80 studies in the library are filed under How common it is with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The How common it is hub.

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →