Home › Research › Getting a diagnosis
Documentation and evaluation of cognitive impairment in elderly primary care patients
Callahan CM, Hendrie HC, Tierney WM.. Annals of internal medicine, 1995-03-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Objective To describe the prevalence of cognitive impairment among elderly primary care patients and to compare diagnostic evaluations and use of health services among patients with and those without cognitive impairment. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Academic primary care group practice. Patients 3954 patients aged 60 years and older who completed the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire during routine office visits. Measurements Demographics and comorbid illness at baseline, diagnostic evaluations for cognitive impairment, use of standard and preventive health services, use of psychoactive drugs, and death in the year after the screening date. Results The prevalence of cognitive impairment among all patients aged 60 years and older at baseline was 15.7%; 10.5% had mild impairment and 5.2% had moderate to severe impairment. Patients with moderate to severe impairment were significantly older than patients with no impairment (76.2 years and 67.4 years, respectively), were more likely to be black (85.8% and 61.3%), had fewer years of education (7.3 years and 9.2 years), and were more likely to have cerebrovascular disease (20.4% and 6.3%) and evidence of undernutrition (30.6% and 16.9%). Dementia was recorded as a diagnosis for less than 25% of patients with moderate to severe cognitive impairment, but patients with documented impairment were more likely to have been evaluated for reversible causes. In the year after screening, patients with moderate to severe impairment were more likely than those with no impairment both to be hospitalized (29.1% and 16.5%) and to visit the emergency department (55.8% and 38.5%) but had fewer outpatient visits (6.0 and 7.6) and greater mortality (8.2% and 2.8%). Conclusions Cognitive impairment is associated with increased use of health services and increased mortality. Patients with undocumented cognitive impairment were significantly less likely to be evaluated for reversible causes. Research is needed to determine if better documentation of cognitive impairment would improve not only diagnostic evaluations but also patient management, counseling, and outcomes.
Key findings
- Results The prevalence of cognitive impairment among all patients aged 60 years and older at baseline was 15.7%; 10.5% had mild impairment and 5.2% had moderate to severe impairment.
- Patients with moderate to severe impairment were significantly older than patients with no impairment (76.2 years and 67.4 years, respectively), were more likely to be black (85.8% and 61.3%), had fewer years of education (7.3 years and 9.2 years), and were more likely to have cerebrovascular disease (20.4% and 6.3%) and evidence of undernutrition (30.6% and 16.9%).
- Conclusions Cognitive impairment is associated with increased use of health services and increased mortality.
- Patients with undocumented cognitive impairment were significantly less likely to be evaluated for reversible causes.
Why it matters
In one academic primary care practice, 15.7% of 3,954 patients aged 60+ screened positive for cognitive impairment, yet dementia was recorded for fewer than 25% of those with moderate to severe impairment. Patients whose impairment went unrecorded were significantly less likely to be checked for reversible causes. In the following year, the moderate–severe group had more hospital stays (29.1% vs 16.5%) and higher mortality (8.2% vs 2.8%), but the authors describe these as associations and say it is still untested whether better documentation would improve outcomes.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Getting a diagnosis →
Study details
- Study designcohort study
- Participants3,954
- Effect size15.7%; 10.5%; 5.2%
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 67/100
Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Annals of internal medicine) |
| Journal's citation record | 4 / 4 | Annals of Internal Medicine: journal h-index 648 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A cohort study following people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1995 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 3 / 4 | 3,954 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 6 / 7 | Cited 521 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 3 / 5 | 15.8 citations a year over 33 year(s) since 1995 |
| Impact for its field and year | 4 / 6 | Cited 8.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 3 / 6 | Cited by 24 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 9 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author William M. Tierney: h-index 87 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | Indiana University School of Medicine: institution h-index 784 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 7856990) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Total | 67 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Callahan, C. M., Hendrie, H. C., & Tierney, W. M. (1995). Documentation and evaluation of cognitive impairment in elderly primary care patients. Annals of internal medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00004
Vancouver
Callahan CM, Hendrie HC, Tierney WM. Documentation and evaluation of cognitive impairment in elderly primary care patients. Annals of internal medicine. 1995. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00004. PMID: 7856990.
BibTeX
@article{callahan1995-7856990,
author = {Callahan, C. M. and Hendrie, H. C. and Tierney, W. M.},
title = {{Documentation and evaluation of cognitive impairment in elderly primary care patients}},
journal = {Annals of internal medicine},
year = {1995},
doi = {10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00004},
pmid = {7856990},
url = {https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00004}
}
Later studies that cite this one
24 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.
Related studies in Getting a diagnosis
Also tagged “assessment”
840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.