Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Importance Emerging evidence suggests that mild cognitive impairment, which is a precursor to Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD), places older adults at increased risk for falls. However, the risk that an older adult develops dementia after experiencing a fall is unknown. Objective To determine the risk of new ADRD diagnosis after a fall in older adults. Design, setting, and participants This retrospective cohort study examined Medicare Fee-for-Service data from 2014 to 2015, with follow-up data available for at least 1 year after the index encounter. Participants included adults aged 66 years and older who experienced a traumatic injury that resulted in an emergency department (ED) or inpatient encounter and did not have a preexisting diagnosis of dementia. Data analysis was performed from August 2023 to July 2024. Exposures Experiencing a fall compared with other mechanisms of injury, defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 external cause of injury codes. Main outcomes and measures The hazard of new ADRD diagnosis within 1 year of a fall, assessed by performing a Cox multivariable competing risk model that controlled for potential confounders while accounting for the competing risk of death. Results The study included 2 453 655 older adult patients who experienced a traumatic injury; 1 522 656 (62.1%) were female; 124 396 (5.1%) were Black and 2 232 102 (91.0%) were White; and the mean (SD) age was 78.1 (8.1) years. The mechanism of injury was a fall in 1 228 847 incidents (50.1%). ADRD was more frequently diagnosed within 1 year of a fall compared with other injury mechanisms (10.6% [129 910 of 1 228 847] vs 6.1% [74 799 of 1 224 808]; P Conclusions and relevance In this cohort study, new ADRD diagnoses were more common after falls compared with other mechanisms of injury, with 10.6% of older adults being diagnosed with ADRD in the first year after a fall. To improve the early identification of ADRD, this study's findings suggest support for the implementation of cognitive screening in older adults who experience an injurious fall that results in an ED visit or hospital admission.

Key findings

Why it matters

This cohort study examined the risk of a new dementia diagnosis within one year after an injurious fall in older adults without preexisting dementia. The text provided does not report the study's results, so no conclusion about falls and dementia risk can be drawn.

Study details

Limitations

Falls may be caused by undiagnosed dementia already present (the study identifies detection opportunity rather than causation); claims-based diagnoses; fee-for-service Medicare only.

How this study scored 65/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 64 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 65 of 100. Total 65 of 100.64 of the 98 points we could judge = 65 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 64 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 65 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA Network Open)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 JAMA Network Open: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 2,453,655 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 26 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 6.5 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 7.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 3 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 26 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Molly Price Jarman: h-index 25 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Brigham and Women's Hospital: institution h-index 1,995 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39348117)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 64 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 64 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 65 out of 100.
Total 65 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Ordoobadi, A. J., Dhanani, H., Tulebaev, SR., Salim, A., Cooper, Z., & Jarman, M. P. (2024). Risk of Dementia Diagnosis After Injurious Falls in Older Adults. JAMA Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36606

Vancouver

Ordoobadi AJ, Dhanani H, Tulebaev SR, Salim A, Cooper Z, Jarman MP. Risk of Dementia Diagnosis After Injurious Falls in Older Adults. JAMA Network Open. 2024. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36606. PMID: 39348117.

BibTeX

@article{ordoobadi2024-39348117,
  author  = {Ordoobadi, A. J. and Dhanani, H. and Tulebaev, SR. and Salim, A. and Cooper, Z. and Jarman, M. P.},
  title   = {{Risk of Dementia Diagnosis After Injurious Falls in Older Adults}},
  journal = {JAMA Network Open},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36606},
  pmid    = {39348117},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36606}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →