Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 57 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology

Introduction Heart failure (HF) affects more than 5.1 million Americans and is projected to increase. Understanding the relationship between hospitalization and mortality can help to guide clinical management. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of repeat HF hospitalizations on all-cause mortality and to determine risk variables related to patient mortality. Materials and methods Using administrative data from the Military Health System, a cohort of patients with an index admission for HF between 2007 and 2011 was identified. HF hospitalizations were defined as any hospital claim with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis of 428.xx in the primary diagnosis field over the 7-year study period (2007-2013). Patients were subsequently categorized based on total number of HF hospitalizations. A multivariate Cox regression model, adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities, was used to estimate hazard ratios. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed based on the frequency of HF hospitalizations. Results Of the 51,286 patients admitted for HF, 54.7% were male with a mean (SD) age of 76.3 (10.8) years, and 29,714 died during 135,211 person-years of follow-up. Mean survival time was 2.6, 1.8, 1.5, and 1.3 years after the first, second, third, and fourth hospitalization, respectively. The mortality rate of patients at 30 days and 1 year postindex HF hospitalization was 7.4% and 27.3%, respectively. A history of dementia and chronic kidney disease without dialysis decreased overall survival. Conclusions Repeat HF hospitalizations remain a strong predictor of mortality for existing patients with HF. As a result, clinicians and patients can individualize the optimal treatment strategy and resources on the basis of the suspected prognosis.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 57/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 33 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 57 of 100. Total 57 of 100.33 of the 58 points we could judge = 57 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 33 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 57 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Military medicine)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2017 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 51,286 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 28885958)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 33 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 33 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 57 out of 100.
Total 57 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Lin, A. H., Chin, J. C., Sicignano, N. M., & Evans, A. M. (2017). Repeat Hospitalizations Predict Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure. Military medicine. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-17-00017

Vancouver

Lin AH, Chin JC, Sicignano NM, Evans AM. Repeat Hospitalizations Predict Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure. Military medicine. 2017. doi:10.7205/milmed-d-17-00017. PMID: 28885958.

BibTeX

@article{lin2017-28885958,
  author  = {Lin, A. H. and Chin, J. C. and Sicignano, N. M. and Evans, A. M.},
  title   = {{Repeat Hospitalizations Predict Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure}},
  journal = {Military medicine},
  year    = {2017},
  doi     = {10.7205/milmed-d-17-00017},
  pmid    = {28885958},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-17-00017}
}

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “deaths”

109 studies in the library carry the topic tag “deaths”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 109 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →