Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Advances in genetic research have provided a basis for susceptibility testing for Alzheimer disease (AD). Prior surveys have examined attitudes toward genetic testing for AD in hypothetical scenarios, but it is unclear what reasons would motivate people to seek testing in real-life situations. This study presents data from the first randomized trial to evaluate genetic susceptibility testing for asymptomatic adult children of people with AD. We examined (1) reasons endorsed as motivations for seeking testing, (2) demographic characteristics associated with these reasons, and (3) how these reasons related to the eventual decision to pursue testing. Eligible participants were 206 adult children of people with AD (mean age 53 years; 72% female; 93% white), 77.7% of whom (n = 160) went on to seek testing. Participants endorsed numerous reasons for seeking susceptibility testing (mean 7.2), encompassing a range of motivations. The most commonly endorsed reasons were as follows: (1) to contribute to research (93.9%), (2) to arrange personal affairs (87.4%), and (3) the hope that effective treatment will be developed (86.8%). Women strongly endorsed more reasons for seeking testing than men (p < 0.05). The best predictor of actual pursuit of testing was strong endorsement of the need to prepare family members for AD (odds ratio = 3.3, p < 0.01). Findings suggest that genetic susceptibility testing is of interest to individuals at risk for AD for a variety of reasons, even in the relative absence of available treatments.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study examined why 206 adult children of people with Alzheimer's disease sought genetic susceptibility testing, with the most common reasons being to contribute to research, arrange personal affairs, and hope for effective treatment. The findings show interest in testing even without available treatments, but the study does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 63 of 100.63 of 100 points earned37 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer disease and associated disorders)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders: journal h-index 131 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2003 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 2 / 4 160 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 89 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.6 citations a year over 25 year(s) since 2003
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 4 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Robert C. Green: h-index 32 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Cornell University: institution h-index 1,649 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12794385)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Roberts, J. S., LaRusse, S. A., Katzen, H., Whitehouse, P. J., Barber, M., Post, S. G., et al. (2003). Reasons for seeking genetic susceptibility testing among first-degree relatives of people with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-200304000-00006

Vancouver

Roberts JS, LaRusse SA, Katzen H, Whitehouse PJ, Barber M, Post SG, et al. Reasons for seeking genetic susceptibility testing among first-degree relatives of people with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. 2003. doi:10.1097/00002093-200304000-00006. PMID: 12794385.

BibTeX

@article{roberts2003-12794385,
  author  = {Roberts, J. S. and LaRusse, S. A. and Katzen, H. and Whitehouse, P. J. and Barber, M. and Post, S. G. and Relkin, N. and Quaid, K. and others},
  title   = {{Reasons for seeking genetic susceptibility testing among first-degree relatives of people with Alzheimer disease}},
  journal = {Alzheimer disease and associated disorders},
  year    = {2003},
  doi     = {10.1097/00002093-200304000-00006},
  pmid    = {12794385},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-200304000-00006}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

4 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Treatments

Also in Treatments

166 studies in the library are filed under Treatments with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Treatments hub.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →