Home › Research › Treatments
Real-world experience with baseline characteristics and safety of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease in Eastern China
Leng L, Liao Z, Lu P, Sun Y, Weng Q, Fan W, Zhu H, Wu W et al.. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025-12-15
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
BackgroundLecanemab reduces amyloid levels and modestly slows cognitive decline in a large cohort of early Alzheimer's disease (AD) but lacks real-world safety data in Chinese population.ObjectiveThe real-world study aims to analyze baseline characteristics and preliminary safety of lecanemab for AD in Zhejiang Province, and to evaluate the efficacy of plasma biomarkers for patient screening.MethodsThis multi-center study included 190 patients with AD in Zhejiang Province, who completed baseline assessments and received lecanemab treatment with follow-up.ResultsThe study included 176 participants with early AD and 14 moderate. In the early AD (mean age 68.04 years, Mini-Mental State Examination 20.03 and Montreal Cognitive Assessment 14.93), 124 (70.5%) participants were female, and 127 (72.1%) were junior high school education level or less. APOE4 heterozygote was predominant (48.9%). Logistic regression for distinguishing early AD from the Aβ negative cognitively unimpaired populations showed that p-Tau 217 independently provided better classification efficacy (area under the curve = 0.9983, p < 0.0001). In the early AD, 29 (16.5%) participants experienced infusion-related reactions (IRR) after the first-dose lecanemab, and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) were identified in 17 patients (9.7%), while 3 (21.4%) with IRR and none ARIA observed in the moderate AD.ConclusionsThe real-world lecanemab cohort had more females, lower educational level, and higher disease burden compared with the clinical trial cohort. Overall lecanemab exhibited a manageable short-term safety profile with no measurable cognitive efficacy. Extensive monitoring and management are required for ARIA of clinically importance. The plasma p-Tau 217 showed high accuracy for early AD screening.
Key findings
- Logistic regression for distinguishing early AD from the Aβ negative cognitively unimpaired populations showed that p-Tau 217 independently provided better classification efficacy (area under the curve = 0.9983, p < 0.0001).
- In the early AD, 29 (16.5%) participants experienced infusion-related reactions (IRR) after the first-dose lecanemab, and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) were identified in 17 patients (9.7%), while 3 (21.4%) with IRR and none ARIA observed in the moderate AD.ConclusionsThe real-world lecanemab cohort had more females, lower educational level, and higher disease burden compared with the clinical trial cohort.
- Overall lecanemab exhibited a manageable short-term safety profile with no measurable cognitive efficacy.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Participants190
- Effect size70.5%; 72.1%; 48.9%
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 59/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 36 of the 61 points we could judge it on, which is 59 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 190 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41396015) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 36 / 61 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 36 of the 61 points we could judge it on is 59 out of 100. |
| Total | 59 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Leng, L., Liao, Z., Lu, P., Sun, Y., Weng, Q., Fan, W., et al. (2026). Real-world experience with baseline characteristics and safety of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease in Eastern China. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251406619
Vancouver
Leng L, Liao Z, Lu P, Sun Y, Weng Q, Fan W, et al. Real-world experience with baseline characteristics and safety of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease in Eastern China. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. 2026. doi:10.1177/13872877251406619. PMID: 41396015.
BibTeX
@article{leng2026-41396015,
author = {Leng, L. and Liao, Z. and Lu, P. and Sun, Y. and Weng, Q. and Fan, W. and Zhu, H. and Wu, W. and others},
title = {{Real-world experience with baseline characteristics and safety of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease in Eastern China}},
journal = {Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1177/13872877251406619},
pmid = {41396015},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251406619}
}
Related studies in Treatments
Also tagged “aducanumab”
332 studies in the library carry the topic tag “aducanumab”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 332 tagged studies.