Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Lewy body dementia

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) are subtypes of Lewy body dementia, and are considered two ends of a disease spectrum. However, conventional MRI neuroimaging, mainly focused on grey matter volume and thickness, has failed to establish whether underlying processes differ between them. Understanding these differences could enable targeted and subtype-specific treatments to be developed. We applied quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), an advanced neuroimaging technique sensitive to tissue iron, to examine differences in tissue composition between these Lewy body dementia subtypes. We performed both voxel-wise and region of interest analyses to compare QSM values in 66 people with Lewy body dementia (45 DLB; 21 PDD), 86 people with Parkinson's disease with normal cognition (PD-NC) and 37 healthy controls. We also assessed relationships between QSM values and measures of both cognitive performance and overall disease severity in people with Lewy body dementia. We found that people with Lewy body dementia had higher QSM values in widespread brain regions, compared with cognitively normal people with PD, and that people with PDD had higher QSM values across many brain regions, compared with people with DLB. Further, we showed a positive relationship between QSM values and overall disease severity, measured using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in people with Lewy body dementia, in the right thalamus, left pallidum, bilateral substantia nigra, bilateral middle frontal, temporal and lateral occipital lobes, right precentral and superior frontal cortices. In a region of interest analysis, we showed that people with PDD had higher QSM values than cognitively normal people with PD and controls in the substantia nigra pars reticulata. Our findings indicate neurobiological differences between subtypes of Lewy body dementia, that can be detected by exploiting QSM's sensitivity to tissue composition. Based on this, DLB and PDD could be considered as distinct conditions in the clinic and in clinical trials, and may respond to different treatments. Our finding that QSM values relate to real-world measures of overall disease severity in Lewy body dementia indicates its potential as an imaging biomarker for clinical trials of Lewy body dementia interventions.

Key findings

Why it matters

Using quantitative susceptibility mapping, this study found higher values in widespread brain regions in people with Lewy body dementia compared with cognitively normal people with Parkinson's disease, and higher values in Parkinson's disease dementia than in dementia with Lewy bodies. The authors suggest understanding these differences could enable targeted subtype-specific treatments, but no treatment, cure or prevention is tested.

Study details

How this study scored 48/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 48 of 100.48 of 100 points earned52 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Brain)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Brain: journal h-index 503 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 66 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Rimona Sharon Weil: h-index 39 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University College London: institution h-index 2,029 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40904193)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 48 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Bhome, R., Thomas, G. E. C., Hannaway, N., Dobreva, I., Zarkali, A., Shmueli, K., et al. (2025). Quantitative susceptibility mapping reveals differences between subtypes of Lewy body dementia. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf325

Vancouver

Bhome R, Thomas GEC, Hannaway N, Dobreva I, Zarkali A, Shmueli K, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping reveals differences between subtypes of Lewy body dementia. Brain. 2025. doi:10.1093/brain/awaf325. PMID: 40904193.

BibTeX

@article{bhome2025-40904193,
  author  = {Bhome, Rohan and Thomas, George E. C. and Hannaway, Naomi and Dobreva, Ivelina and Zarkali, Angeliki and Shmueli, Karin and Cole, James Howard and Weil, Rimona Sharon},
  title   = {{Quantitative susceptibility mapping reveals differences between subtypes of Lewy body dementia}},
  journal = {Brain},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/brain/awaf325},
  pmid    = {40904193},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf325}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Lewy body dementia

Similar studies

More on Lewy body dementia

See all studies in Lewy body dementia →