Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Clinical safety

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

Background Injury is an external stressor that often initiates a cycle of decline in many older adults. The influence of physical frailty and cognitive decline on 6-month and 1-year outcomes after injury is unreported. We hypothesized that physical frailty and cognitive impairment would be predictive of 6-month and 1-year postinjury function and overall mortality. Methods The sample involved patients who are 65 years or older admitted to a Level I trauma center between October 2013 and March 2014 with a primary injury diagnosis. Surrogates of 188 patients were interviewed within 48 hours of hospital admission to determine preinjury cognitive and physical frailty impairments using brief screening instruments. Follow-up was completed on 172 patients at 6 months and 176 patients at 1 year to determine posthospitalization status and outcomes. Data analysis involved frequencies, measures of central tendency, χ analyses, linear and logistic regression. Results The mean age of the patients was 77 years. The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 10. The mechanism of injury involved falls from standing (n = 101, 54%). Preinjury vulnerabilities included cognitive impairment (AD8 Dementia Screen [AD8] score ≥ 2, n = 93, 50%) and physical frailty (Vulnerable Elders Survey [VES-13] score ≥ 4, n = 94, 50%). Overall, median physical frailty scores did not return to baseline in the majority of survivors at 1 year. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that preinjury cognitive impairment (6 months, AD8, β = -0.20, p = 0.002) and preinjury physical frailty (6 months, Barthel Index, β = 0.60, p < 0.001; 1 year, Barthel Index, β = 0.52, p < 0.001) are independently associated with physical function (frailty). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.14), injury severity (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12), and preinjury physical frailty (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.47) are independently associated with overall mortality at 1 year. Conclusion Preinjury physical frailty is the predominant predictor of postinjury functional status and mortality in geriatric trauma patients. Identification of frailty and appropriate follow-up are crucial for decision making by providers, patients, and family caregivers. Level of evidence Prognostic study, level II.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Maxwell, C. A., Mion, L. C., Mukherjee, K., Dietrich, M. S., Minnick, A., May, A., et al. (2016). Preinjury physical frailty and cognitive impairment among geriatric trauma patients determine postinjury functional recovery and survival. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000000929

Vancouver

Maxwell CA, Mion LC, Mukherjee K, Dietrich MS, Minnick A, May A, et al. Preinjury physical frailty and cognitive impairment among geriatric trauma patients determine postinjury functional recovery and survival. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2016. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000000929. PMID: 26595712.

BibTeX

@article{maxwell2016-26595712,
  author  = {Maxwell, C. A. and Mion, L. C. and Mukherjee, K. and Dietrich, M. S. and Minnick, A. and May, A. and Miller, R. S.},
  title   = {{Preinjury physical frailty and cognitive impairment among geriatric trauma patients determine postinjury functional recovery and survival}},
  journal = {The journal of trauma and acute care surgery},
  year    = {2016},
  doi     = {10.1097/ta.0000000000000929},
  pmid    = {26595712},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000000929}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 26 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 45 of 100. Total 45 of 100.26 of the 58 points we could judge = 45 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The journal of trauma and acute care surgery)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2016 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 101 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 26595712)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 26 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100.
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Clinical safety from nearby years

Also tagged “palliative”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “palliative”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Clinical safety

See all studies in Clinical safety →