Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Three themes identified include (a) LOVOT's role in supporting engagement and stimulating conversation, (b) the irreplaceability of human touch and emotional nuances, and (c) concerns about ownership and equitable resource allocation. Older adults emphasized that LOVOT has the potential to act as an active role as a companion for older adults with dementia. They also identified opportunities for improvement in design, especially around cultural responsiveness, technological familiarity and safety. This reflection brings forward the lived experience perspectives from older adults with dementia, and family partners as co-researchers, offering valuable insights to guide ethical and person-centered implementation of SARs like LOVOT in LTC settings.

Key findings

Why it matters

People with dementia and family caregivers described a socially assistive robot as supporting engagement and conversation, but stressed that human touch and emotional nuance cannot be replaced. They also raised concerns about ownership and fair allocation of such resources, so this work informs how robots might be introduced ethically in long-term care rather than offering a treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 36/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 36 of 100.36 of 100 points earned64 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Digital Health)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Digital Health: journal h-index 77 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Lillian Hung: h-index 28 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of British Columbia: institution h-index 1,424 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41229939)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 36 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Lee, K., Wong, J., Wong, K. L. Y., Wong, J., Cabrera-Guerra, J., Singh, R., et al. (2025). Perspectives on artificial intelligence-enabled socially assistive robots in long-term care: Experiences with LOVOT among people with dementia and family caregivers. Digital Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251393299

Vancouver

Lee K, Wong J, Wong KLY, Wong J, Cabrera-Guerra J, Singh R, et al. Perspectives on artificial intelligence-enabled socially assistive robots in long-term care: Experiences with LOVOT among people with dementia and family caregivers. Digital Health. 2025. doi:10.1177/20552076251393299. PMID: 41229939.

BibTeX

@article{lee2025-41229939,
  author  = {Lee, Kayoung and Wong, Joey and Wong, Karen Lok Yi and Wong, Jeffrey and Cabrera-Guerra, Javier and Singh, Riea and Fong, Arwen and Lou, Ray and others},
  title   = {{Perspectives on artificial intelligence-enabled socially assistive robots in long-term care: Experiences with LOVOT among people with dementia and family caregivers}},
  journal = {Digital Health},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1177/20552076251393299},
  pmid    = {41229939},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251393299}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →