Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Patterns of cortical thinning in the language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Rohrer JD, Warren JD, Modat M, Ridgway GR, Douiri A, Rossor MN, Ourselin S, Fox NC.. Neurology, 2009-05-01
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Background Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a clinically, genetically, and pathologically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder. Two subtypes commonly present with a language disorder: semantic dementia (SemD) and progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA). Methods Patients meeting consensus criteria for PNFA and SemD who had volumetric MRI of sufficient quality to allow cortical thickness analysis were recruited from a tertiary referral clinic: 44 (11 pathologically confirmed) patients with SemD and 32 (4 pathologically confirmed) patients with PNFA and 29 age-matched and gender-matched healthy controls were recruited. Cortical thickness analysis was performed using the Freesurfer software tools. Results Patients with SemD had significant cortical thinning in the left temporal lobe, particularly temporal pole, entorhinal cortex, and parahippocampal, fusiform, and inferior temporal gyri. A similar but less extensive pattern of loss was seen in the right temporal lobe and (with increasing severity) also in left orbitofrontal, inferior frontal, insular, and cingulate cortices. Patients with PNFA had involvement particularly of the left superior temporal lobe, inferior frontal lobe, and insula, and (with increasing severity) other areas in the left frontal, lateral temporal, and anterior parietal lobes. Similar patterns were seen in the pathologically confirmed cases. Patterns of cortical thinning differed between groups: SemD had significantly more cortical thinning in the temporal lobes bilaterally while PNFA had significantly more thinning in the frontal and parietal lobes. Conclusions The language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration have distinctive and significantly different patterns of cortical thinning. Increasing disease severity is associated with spread of cortical thinning and the pattern of spread is consistent with progression of clinical deficits.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Rohrer, J. D., Warren, J. D., Modat, M., Ridgway, G. R., Douiri, A., Rossor, M. N., et al. (2009). Patterns of cortical thinning in the language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a4124e
Vancouver
Rohrer JD, Warren JD, Modat M, Ridgway GR, Douiri A, Rossor MN, et al. Patterns of cortical thinning in the language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2009. doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a4124e. PMID: 19414722.
BibTeX
@article{rohrer2009-19414722,
author = {Rohrer, J. D. and Warren, J. D. and Modat, M. and Ridgway, G. R. and Douiri, A. and Rossor, M. N. and Ourselin, S. and Fox, N. C.},
title = {{Patterns of cortical thinning in the language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration}},
journal = {Neurology},
year = {2009},
doi = {10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a4124e},
pmid = {19414722},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a4124e}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results Patients with SemD had significant cortical thinning in the left temporal lobe, particularly temporal pole, entorhinal cortex, and parahippocampal, fusiform, and inferior temporal gyri.
- Patterns of cortical thinning differed between groups: SemD had significantly more cortical thinning in the temporal lobes bilaterally while PNFA had significantly more thinning in the frontal and parietal lobes.
- Conclusions The language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration have distinctive and significantly different patterns of cortical thinning.
- Increasing disease severity is associated with spread of cortical thinning and the pattern of spread is consistent with progression of clinical deficits.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 40/100
Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2009 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19414722) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 23 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100. |
| Total | 40 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Brain scans and imaging
Also tagged “language”
2 studies in the library carry the topic tag “language”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 2 tagged studies.