Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100. How common it is

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Plain-language summary

Exposure to particulate matter (PM) in the ambient air and its interactions with APOE alleles may contribute to the acceleration of brain aging and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Neurodegenerative effects of particulate air pollutants were examined in a US-wide cohort of older women from the Women's Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS) and in experimental mouse models. Residing in places with fine PM exceeding EPA standards increased the risks for global cognitive decline and all-cause dementia respectively by 81 and 92%, with stronger adverse effects in APOE ɛ4/4 carriers. Female EFAD transgenic mice (5xFAD +/- /human APOE ɛ3 or ɛ4 +/+ ) with 225 h exposure to urban nanosized PM (nPM) over 15 weeks showed increased cerebral β-amyloid by thioflavin S for fibrillary amyloid and by immunocytochemistry for Aβ deposits, both exacerbated by APOE ɛ4. Moreover, nPM exposure increased Aβ oligomers, caused selective atrophy of hippocampal CA1 neurites, and decreased the glutamate GluR1 subunit. Wildtype C57BL/6 female mice also showed nPM-induced CA1 atrophy and GluR1 decrease. In vitro nPM exposure of neuroblastoma cells (N2a-APP/swe) increased the pro-amyloidogenic processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP). We suggest that airborne PM exposure promotes pathological brain aging in older women, with potentially a greater impact in ɛ4 carriers. The underlying mechanisms may involve increased cerebral Aβ production and selective changes in hippocampal CA1 neurons and glutamate receptor subunits.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Moderate

In older US women from the WHIMS cohort, living where fine particulate air pollution exceeded EPA standards was associated with an 81% higher risk of global cognitive decline and a 92% higher risk of dementia, with stronger effects in women carrying two APOE ɛ4 copies. Separately, mice exposed to urban nanosized particles for 15 weeks developed more brain β-amyloid (worse with APOE ɛ4) and shrinkage of memory-region (CA1) nerve branches — the latter even in normal mice.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Cacciottolo, M., Wang, X., Driscoll, I., Woodward, N., Saffari, A., Reyes, J., et al. (2017). Particulate air pollutants, APOE alleles and their contributions to cognitive impairment in older women and to amyloidogenesis in experimental models. Translational psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.280

Vancouver

Cacciottolo M, Wang X, Driscoll I, Woodward N, Saffari A, Reyes J, et al. Particulate air pollutants, APOE alleles and their contributions to cognitive impairment in older women and to amyloidogenesis in experimental models. Translational psychiatry. 2017. doi:10.1038/tp.2016.280. PMID: 28140404.

BibTeX

@article{cacciottolo2017-28140404,
  author  = {Cacciottolo, M. and Wang, X. and Driscoll, I. and Woodward, N. and Saffari, A. and Reyes, J. and Serre, M. L. and Vizuete, W. and others},
  title   = {{Particulate air pollutants, APOE alleles and their contributions to cognitive impairment in older women and to amyloidogenesis in experimental models}},
  journal = {Translational psychiatry},
  year    = {2017},
  doi     = {10.1038/tp.2016.280},
  pmid    = {28140404},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.280}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In older US women from the WHIMS cohort, living where fine particulate air pollution exceeded EPA standards was associated with an 81% higher risk of global cognitive decline and a 92% higher risk of dementia, with stronger effects in women carrying two APOE ɛ4 copies. Separately, mice exposed to urban nanosized particles for 15 weeks developed more brain β-amyloid (worse with APOE ɛ4) and shrinkage of memory-region (CA1) nerve branches — the latter even in normal mice. The authors suggest air pollution may promote pathological brain aging; the human result is an association, not proof of cause.

Study details

How this study scored 55/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 53 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 55 of 100. Total 55 of 100.53 of the 96 points we could judge = 55 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 53 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 55 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Translational psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Translational Psychiatry: journal h-index 180 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2017 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 433 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 39.4 citations a year over 11 year(s) since 2017
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 26.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 17 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 123 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author J C Chen holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: institution h-index 1,674 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 28140404)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 53 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 53 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 55 out of 100.
Total 55 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

17 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in How common it is from nearby years

Also tagged “precursor”

1,337 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,337 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →