Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Optical coherence tomography and neurodegeneration: are eyes the windows to the brain?
Sahil Gupta, Robert Zivadinov, Murali Ramanathan, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman. Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2016-05-09
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
INTRODUCTION: Central nervous system (CNS) pathologies have ocular manifestations due to direct and/or retrograde degeneration of the visual pathways, most often related to a direct injury to the optic nerve, retinal ganglion cells and/or its surrounding cells. These ocular manifestations can be recognized and monitored by a non-invasive technique called Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). AREAS COVERED: This review article describes the OCT technique and its application in various neurological pathologies. OCT helps in the measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and macular thickness which consists of retinal ganglion cells. OCT provides a near-histological level of image resolution up to 5µm by using principles of interferometry that can detect CNS inflammatory, as well as degenerative, pathologies (i.e Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's Disease etc.) at initial clinical and possibly subclinical stages. Expert Commentary: RNFLT and macular volumes measured by OCT can serve as biomarkers for early recognition and progression of a variety of neurological disease, although the specificity of these findings in clinical diagnosis requires further refinement. An early biomarker can help in an earlier therapeutic intervention and thus preventing further progression and provide the opportunity for possible regenerative interventions of the underlying disease process. With the advent of "next-generation" OCT technology an increase in use is foreseen in research as well as in clinical practice.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Gupta, S., Zivadinov, R., Ramanathan, M., & Weinstock-Guttman, B. (2016). Optical coherence tomography and neurodegeneration: are eyes the windows to the brain? Expert review of neurotherapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2016.1180978
Vancouver
Gupta S, Zivadinov R, Ramanathan M, Weinstock-Guttman B. Optical coherence tomography and neurodegeneration: are eyes the windows to the brain? Expert review of neurotherapeutics. 2016. doi:10.1080/14737175.2016.1180978. PMID: 27138997.
BibTeX
@article{gupta2016-27138997,
author = {Gupta, Sahil and Zivadinov, Robert and Ramanathan, Murali and Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca},
title = {{Optical coherence tomography and neurodegeneration: are eyes the windows to the brain?}},
journal = {Expert review of neurotherapeutics},
year = {2016},
doi = {10.1080/14737175.2016.1180978},
pmid = {27138997},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2016.1180978}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Expert Commentary: RNFLT and macular volumes measured by OCT can serve as biomarkers for early recognition and progression of a variety of neurological disease, although the specificity of these findings in clinical diagnosis requires further refinement.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 38/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Expert review of neurotherapeutics) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2016 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 27138997) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 21 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100. |
| Total | 38 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Brain scans and imaging
Also tagged “optical”
151 studies in the library carry the topic tag “optical”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 151 tagged studies.