Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Plain-language summary

The clinical and biological features of Alzheimer disease are not uniform in their expression; heterogeneity is evident in the disease's clinical, anatomic, and physiologic characteristics. The presence of considerable intersubject and intrasubject heterogeneity suggests that subtypes of the disease exist. We define subtypes of Alzheimer disease in regard to the behavioral features (for example, predominant right or left hemisphere, or symmetrical impairment), inheritance (familial or sporadic), dosage of chromosome 21 (presence of the Down syndrome), time course of progression, age of onset (presenile or senile), and presence or absence of motor deficit (myoclonus or signs of an extrapyramidal syndrome). Studies of regional cerebral glucose metabolism with positron emission tomography and [18-fluorine] fluorodeoxyglucose show focal alterations in glucose use, with cerebral metabolic asymmetries in patients with Alzheimer disease that are related to the nature of the cognitive deficit. Serial roentgenographic computed tomographic studies show heterogeneous rates of lateral ventricle enlargement in the disease that are related to rates of cognitive decline. Similar anatomic and physiologic abnormalities are also found in persons 45 years of age or older who have the Down syndrome. Furthermore, patients with Alzheimer disease who have extrapyramidal dysfunction or myoclonus are a distinct subgroup, with specific abnormalities of central monoamine markers of dopamine metabolism, serotonin metabolism, and the hydroxylation cofactor, biopterin. The concept of subtypes in Alzheimer disease serves as a model with which the interactions of genetic influences with environmental factors can be examined.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Low

This is a narrative review. This review describes that Alzheimer's disease is not uniform and that subtypes exist based on features such as inheritance, age of onset, and brain metabolism. It does not report any treatment, cure, or prevention, and notes that similar brain abnormalities are found in people 45 or older with Down syndrome.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Friedland, R. P., Koss, E., Haxby, J. V., Grady, C. L., Luxenberg, J., Schapiro, M. B., et al. (1988). NIH conference. Alzheimer disease: clinical and biological heterogeneity. Annals of internal medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-109-4-298

Vancouver

Friedland RP, Koss E, Haxby JV, Grady CL, Luxenberg J, Schapiro MB, et al. NIH conference. Alzheimer disease: clinical and biological heterogeneity. Annals of internal medicine. 1988. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-109-4-298. PMID: 2969203.

BibTeX

@article{friedland1988-2969203,
  author  = {Friedland, R. P. and Koss, E. and Haxby, J. V. and Grady, C. L. and Luxenberg, J. and Schapiro, M. B. and Kaye, J.},
  title   = {{NIH conference. Alzheimer disease: clinical and biological heterogeneity}},
  journal = {Annals of internal medicine},
  year    = {1988},
  doi     = {10.7326/0003-4819-109-4-298},
  pmid    = {2969203},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-109-4-298}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review describes that Alzheimer's disease is not uniform and that subtypes exist based on features such as inheritance, age of onset, and brain metabolism. It does not report any treatment, cure, or prevention, and notes that similar brain abnormalities are found in people 45 or older with Down syndrome.

Study details

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 44 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 46 of 100. Total 46 of 100.44 of the 96 points we could judge = 46 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 44 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 46 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Annals of internal medicine)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Annals of Internal Medicine: journal h-index 648 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1988 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 101 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.5 citations a year over 40 year(s) since 1988
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 8.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 3 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 3 / 3 National Institutes of Health: institution h-index 2,723 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 2969203)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 44 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 44 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 46 out of 100.
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's from nearby years

Also in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

12 studies in the library are filed under Down syndrome and Alzheimer's with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Down syndrome and Alzheimer's hub.

Similar studies

More on Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

See all studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's →