Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 53 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Objective The identification of susceptibility alleles to risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) is a major public health priority. Using apolipoprotein E genotype (APOE), we examined whether neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes, the pathology underlying clinical AD that presumably lies intermediate in the causal chain, would increase power for genetic associations. Methods More than 700 older persons underwent annual evaluation and organ donation as part of the Religious Orders Study or Rush Memory and Aging Project. A total of 536 autopsied persons with clinical AD or without dementia with APOE genotyping and a quantitative measure of AD pathology were analyzed. Regression analyses were used to examine the relation of APOE to clinical AD, to the level of cognitive function proximate to death, and to measures of AD neuropathology. Results APOE epsilon4 was associated with increased odds of clinical AD (p = 3 x 10(-7)), and its association with level of cognition was stronger (p = 8 x 10(-12)). However, the use of quantitative measures of AD pathology markedly enhanced the association (p = 9 x 10(-24)). The APOE epsilon2 was not associated with either AD (p = 0.69) or level of cognition (p = 0.82). However, its association with AD pathology (p = 1 x 10(-5)) was sufficiently strong that it would have warranted follow-up if discovered in a genome-wide association study. Power calculations demonstrate that a sample size of 625 subjects with our measure of AD pathology would be required to meet genome-wide significance of p = 5 x 10(-8) for epsilon2. Conclusion Discovery efforts for susceptibility loci for Alzheimer disease could benefit from the use of neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes as a complement to other approaches.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that using measures of Alzheimer brain pathology strengthened the genetic association with APOE, and that APOE epsilon2 was linked to Alzheimer pathology even though it was not linked to clinical Alzheimer disease. It is about improving genetic research methods, not about treating or preventing the disease.

Study details

How this study scored 53/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 53 of 100.53 of 100 points earned47 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2009 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 625 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 94 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 4.9 citations a year over 19 year(s) since 2009
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 8 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 8 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Julie A. Schneider: h-index 151 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19398704)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 53 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Bennett, D. A., De Jager, P. L., Leurgans, S. E., & Schneider, J. A. (2009). Neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes enhance association to Alzheimer susceptibility alleles. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a2e87d

Vancouver

Bennett DA, De Jager PL, Leurgans SE, Schneider JA. Neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes enhance association to Alzheimer susceptibility alleles. Neurology. 2009. doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a2e87d. PMID: 19398704.

BibTeX

@article{bennett2009-19398704,
  author  = {Bennett, D. A. and De Jager, P. L. and Leurgans, S. E. and Schneider, J. A.},
  title   = {{Neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes enhance association to Alzheimer susceptibility alleles}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2009},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a2e87d},
  pmid    = {19398704},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a2e87d}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 25.

Later studies that cite this one

8 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “amyloid-beta”

1,339 studies in the library carry the topic tag “amyloid-beta”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,339 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →