Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Dementia is a progressive condition that affects cognitive and functional abilities. Psycho-motor agitation represents a frequent and challenging manifestation in People Living with Dementia (PLwD). This behavior contributes to heightened distress and increased risk of harm for patients, while posing a significant burden for caregivers, who must navigate the complexities of managing unpredictable and potentially harmful agitation episodes. Accurately predicting and promptly responding to agitation events is thus critical for enhancing the safety and well-being of PLwD. Leveraging artificial intelligence, tools can be used to monitor behavioral patterns and alert healthcare providers about potential agitation to facilitate timely and effective interventions. Despite the link between poor sleep quality and the likelihood of agitation, there remains a gap in utilizing sleep parameters for predictive analytics in this domain. This study explores the potential of integrating sleep and associated physiological data to predict the risk of agitation in dementia patients the next day, leveraging the Technology Integrated Health Management (TIHM) dataset. Our analysis reveals that the LightGBM model, enhanced with combined feature sets, delivers superior performance, achieving a weighted F1 score of 93.6% compared to standard baseline models. The findings underscore the value of incorporating sleep data into automated models and advocate for continued efforts to develop long-term agitation prediction methods.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study uses sleep and physiological data to predict next-day agitation in people with dementia, which could help caregivers respond sooner. It addresses symptom management only and does not test any treatment, cure or prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 33/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 33 of 100.33 of 100 points earned67 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Applied Sciences)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Applied Sciences: journal h-index 230 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Fadi Aloul: h-index 34 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 American University of Sharjah: institution h-index 231 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 33 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Ramesh, K., Yakoub, A., Ghoneim, Y., Korabi, R. A., Ramesh, J., Sagahyroon, A. A., et al. (2025). Machine Learning Prediction of Agitation in Dementia Patients Using Sleep and Physiological Data. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189908

Vancouver

Ramesh K, Yakoub A, Ghoneim Y, Korabi RA, Ramesh J, Sagahyroon AA, et al. Machine Learning Prediction of Agitation in Dementia Patients Using Sleep and Physiological Data. Applied Sciences. 2025. doi:10.3390/app15189908.

BibTeX

@article{ramesh2025-0b056e8f,
  author  = {Ramesh, Keshav and Yakoub, Anna and Ghoneim, Youssef and Korabi, Rehab Al and Ramesh, Jayroop and Sagahyroon, Assim A. and Aloul, Fadi},
  title   = {{Machine Learning Prediction of Agitation in Dementia Patients Using Sleep and Physiological Data}},
  journal = {Applied Sciences},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3390/app15189908},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189908}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →