Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Plain-language summary

In 2018, France withdrew reimbursement for cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) in Alzheimer's disease, citing modest efficacy, lack of long-term benefit, and safety concerns. This policy shift provided a unique opportunity to assess ChEI effectiveness in real-world settings, by evaluating, among patients treated with ChEI between 01/08/2017 and 01/08/2018, the impact of treatment discontinuation on cognitive decline (MMSE score) and survival. Using the French National Alzheimer's Database (BNA) and Meotis databases, we emulated a pragmatic, intention-to-treat trial comparing patients who discontinued ChEIs after delisting to those who continued treatment, under quasi-experimental conditions. To model cognitive trajectories, we used the inverse probability treatment-weighted (IPTW) cohort and applied mixed-effects models with random intercepts across all follow-up visits. Survival was estimated with a pooled logistic regression including treatment group, follow-up time, and an interaction between treatment and time. The mean difference in MMSE decline between discontinuers and continuers after one year was 0·97 points (95% CI 0·68-1·27, p < 0·001), reaching 1·81 points (0·91-2·71, p < 0·001), after four years. No significant difference in mortality (RR 1·10, 95% CI [0·95-1·29]) was observed over a five-year period. Our findings confirm and extend prior trials by demonstrating the sustained cognitive benefits of ChEIs in a real-world setting. While acknowledging the limitations associated with its retrospective nature, our study argues for reconsidering the 2018 delisting decision, as ChEIs remain safe and clinically relevant for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Moderate

This study found that people with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease who stopped cholinesterase inhibitors after France removed reimbursement declined more on MMSE scores than those who continued, but it found no significant difference in mortality over five years. The authors argue for reconsidering the 2018 delisting decision, while acknowledging the study's retrospective limitations.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Simon, L., Octave, G., Raphaël, B., Victoria, G., Estelle, A., Chaymae, M., et al. (2026). Long-term effect of discontinuing anticholinesterase treatment on cognitive decline and mortality in Alzheimer's disease in France: a quasi-experiment and target trial emulation study. The Lancet regional health. Europe. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101607

Vancouver

Simon L, Octave G, Raphaël B, Victoria G, Estelle A, Chaymae M, et al. Long-term effect of discontinuing anticholinesterase treatment on cognitive decline and mortality in Alzheimer's disease in France: a quasi-experiment and target trial emulation study. The Lancet regional health. Europe. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101607. PMID: 41732331.

BibTeX

@article{simon2026-41732331,
  author  = {Simon, Lecerf and Octave, Guinebretiere and Raphaël, Bentegeac and Victoria, Gauthier and Estelle, Aymes and Chaymae, Mekkaoui and Julien, Dumurgier and Philippe, Amouyel and others},
  title   = {{Long-term effect of discontinuing anticholinesterase treatment on cognitive decline and mortality in Alzheimer's disease in France: a quasi-experiment and target trial emulation study}},
  journal = {The Lancet regional health. Europe},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101607},
  pmid    = {41732331},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101607}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that people with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease who stopped cholinesterase inhibitors after France removed reimbursement declined more on MMSE scores than those who continued, but it found no significant difference in mortality over five years. The authors argue for reconsidering the 2018 delisting decision, while acknowledging the study's retrospective limitations.

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 40 of 100.40 of 100 points earned60 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Lancet regional health. Europe)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 The Lancet Regional Health - Europe: journal h-index 88 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Thibaud Lebouvier: h-index 47 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique: institution h-index 2,529 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 16 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41732331)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery from nearby years

Also tagged “trial”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “trial”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →