Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

That word allows us to occupy the high moral ground but to no avail. Rather we must require our accrediting agencies and our insurance programs to look at the incentives and the disincentives in the present system and alter them to bring about the desired end. Undoubtedly, persons fall victim to idealizing the past, but with respect to this issue, such is not our sin, for geriatric medicine was not a grand institution that is now in decline; in fact, geriatrics has had potential, and we would propose that it still does—but only if as a nation we recognize our failings and adjust our plan of action. As surely as it is true for our patients, the maximization of the potential of geriatric medicine is what we must achieve—not for the benefits of geriatricians but for the benefit of all who are aging all over the world—in other words, all of us. Author Contributions: Both authors contributed substantially to the preparation of this paper.

Key findings

Why it matters

This opinion piece argues that geriatric medicine has potential but requires changes to incentives and disincentives in accrediting agencies and insurance programs. It calls for maximizing the potential of geriatric medicine for the benefit of all who are aging.

Study details

How this study scored 31/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 31 of 100.31 of 100 points earned69 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: journal h-index 344 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2006 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 22 year(s) since 2006
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author T. Franklin Williams: h-index 32 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 National Institutes of Health: institution h-index 2,723 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 16866689)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 31 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Steel, K., & Williams, T. F. (2006). It's Time to March. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00792.x

Vancouver

Steel K, Williams TF. It's Time to March. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00792.x. PMID: 16866689.

BibTeX

@article{steel2006-16866689,
  author  = {Steel, Knight and Williams, T. Franklin},
  title   = {{It's Time to March}},
  journal = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society},
  year    = {2006},
  doi     = {10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00792.x},
  pmid    = {16866689},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00792.x}
}

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also in Health systems and care delivery

172 studies in the library are filed under Health systems and care delivery with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Health systems and care delivery hub.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →