Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Mild cognitive impairment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The feasibility criteria of >80% was met. All SUS and NASA scores were in the higher index, suggesting a high degree of usability, with low workload demand. For effect, the COWA findings showed a significant improvement (41.38%), with a paired sample T-Test confirming that the participants COWA scores improved significantly from pre- to post-intervention (p = 0.03), indicating enhanced verbal fluency and executive functioning after intervention. HVLT (combined) showed improvements of 18.75% for Form A and 11.32% for Form B, which also showed a significant improvement (p = .04) in the retention discrimination index from pre- to post-test. The TM-A/B test showed an improvement (25.97%), suggesting that the participants spent less time completing both parts A and B, but was not statistically significant. (4) This study fulfilled our aim to demonstrate modest to significant cognitive improvement using VR-CRT with brain cancer patients with MCI. Despite the small sample size, we believe the use of virtual reality will lead to important advances for patients with MCI, particularly the frontal lobe brain region, expressed in executive function.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this small single-arm pilot in brain cancer patients with mild cognitive impairment, virtual reality cognitive training met feasibility criteria and some cognitive test scores improved significantly, while the TM-A/B improvement was not statistically significant. The small sample size and single-arm design mean these preliminary results cannot show that this training treats or prevents Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 24 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 26 of 100. Raw total 26 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 26 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 26 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 24 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 26 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv (preprint))
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Saira Hanif Soroya: h-index 17 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Cincinnati: institution h-index 918 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 24 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 26 out of 100.
Total 26 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Faiola, A., Villano, J. L., & Soroya, S. H. (2026). Investigating the Usability, Feasibility, and Effect of a Virtual Reality Cognitive Training System on Brain Cancer Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Quasi-Experimental (Single-Arm) Pilot Study. medRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.18.26353031

Vancouver

Faiola A, Villano JL, Soroya SH. Investigating the Usability, Feasibility, and Effect of a Virtual Reality Cognitive Training System on Brain Cancer Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Quasi-Experimental (Single-Arm) Pilot Study. medRxiv (preprint). 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.05.18.26353031.

BibTeX

@article{faiola2026-38eaa8de,
  author  = {Faiola, A. and Villano, J. L. and Soroya, S. H.},
  title   = {{Investigating the Usability, Feasibility, and Effect of a Virtual Reality Cognitive Training System on Brain Cancer Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Quasi-Experimental (Single-Arm) Pilot Study}},
  journal = {medRxiv (preprint)},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.05.18.26353031},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.18.26353031}
}

Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Mild cognitive impairment

See all studies in Mild cognitive impairment →