Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's disease staging from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is challenging when clinically adjacent stages and severe class imbalance are considered simultaneously. This study evaluates six-class classification of cognitively normal, subjective memory complaint, early mild cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, late mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease using T1-weighted MRI from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). The final cohort included 3592 MRI volumes from 904 participants, with subjective memory complaint representing 3.79% of the data. We developed a parameter-compact three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) with multi-scale volumetric feature extraction and imbalance-aware training using class weighting, focal loss with label smoothing, weighted sampling, and minority-class intensity perturbation. In the primary evaluation, partitioning was performed at the MRI ImageID (scan) level: a fixed test set of 719 MRI volumes was excluded from model development, while the remaining 2873 vol were used in five stratified training and validation folds. ImageIDs were mutually exclusive across partitions; however, participants were not grouped, and longitudinal scans from the same participant could therefore occur in different partitions. The proposed model achieved 0.9018 ± 0.0452 accuracy, 0.8804 ± 0.0393 macro F1, 0.8762 ± 0.0544 Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), and 0.9463 ± 0.0056 macro area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) under this scan-level protocol. A same-data EfficientNet-B0 baseline achieved stronger aggregate performance, while the proposed model used 43.7% fewer parameters. Paired ablation analysis showed that weighted sampling did not improve aggregate metrics but increased subjective memory complaint precision, recall, and F1, with all corresponding 95% confidence intervals excluding zero. These findings support class-specific evaluation under severe class imbalance while distinguishing scan-level discrimination from participant-independent generalization.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study tested a computer model that sorts MRI brain scans into six stages, from cognitively normal to Alzheimer's disease, and it reached about 90% accuracy. However, scans from the same person could appear in both the training and test data, so the results show how well the model tells scans apart, not how well it would work on new patients.

Study details

How this study scored 48/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 48 of 100.48 of 100 points earned52 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Computers in Biology and Medicine)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Computers in Biology and Medicine: journal h-index 189 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 3,592 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Goo‐Rak Kwon: h-index 27 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Chosun University: institution h-index 207 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42784895)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 48 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Khan, F. F., Kim, J., & Kwon, G. (2026). Multi-scale 3D CNN with imbalance-aware training for structural MRI-based six-class Alzheimer disease staging. Computers in Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2026.111949

Vancouver

Khan FF, Kim J, Kwon G. Multi-scale 3D CNN with imbalance-aware training for structural MRI-based six-class Alzheimer disease staging. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2026.111949. PMID: 42784895.

BibTeX

@article{khan2026-42784895,
  author  = {Khan, Faizaan Fazal and Kim, Jun‐Hyung and Kwon, Goo‐Rak},
  title   = {{Multi-scale 3D CNN with imbalance-aware training for structural MRI-based six-class Alzheimer disease staging}},
  journal = {Computers in Biology and Medicine},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.compbiomed.2026.111949},
  pmid    = {42784895},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2026.111949}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →