Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Clinical data as well as animal and cell studies indicate that certain antidiabetic drugs, including glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), exert therapeutic effects in Alzheimer's disease (AD) by modulating amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) metabolism. Meanwhile, the direct interactions between GLP-1RAs and Aβ and their functional consequences remain unexplored. In this study, the interactions between monomeric Aβ40/Aβ42 of GLP-1(7-37) and its several analogs (semaglutide (Sema), liraglutide (Lira), exenatide (Exen)) were studied using biolayer interferometry and surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy. The quaternary structure of GLP-1RAs was investigated using dynamic light scattering. The effects of GLP-1RAs on Aβ fibrillation were assessed using the thioflavin T assay and electron microscopy. The impact of GLP-1RAs on Aβ cytotoxicity was evaluated via the MTT assay. Monomeric Aβ40 and Aβ42 directly bind to GLP-1(7-37), Sema, Lira, and Exen, with the highest affinity for Lira (the lowest estimates of equilibrium dissociation constants were 42-60 nM). GLP-1RAs are prone to oligomerization, which may affect their binding to Aβ. GLP-1(7-37) and Exen inhibit Aβ40 fibrillation, whereas Sema promotes it. GLP-1 analogs decrease Aβ cytotoxicity toward SH-SY5Y cells, while GLP-1(7-37) enhances Aβ40 cytotoxicity without affecting the cytotoxic effect of Aβ42. Overall, GLP-1RAs interact with Aβ and differentially modulate its fibrillation and cytotoxicity, suggesting the need for further studies of our observed effects in vivo.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Litus, E. A., Shevelyova, M. P., Vologzhannikova, A. A., Deryusheva, E. I., Chaplygina, A. V., Rastrygina, V. A., et al. (2025). Interaction Between Glucagon-like Peptide 1 and Its Analogs with Amyloid-β Peptide Affects Its Fibrillation and Cytotoxicity. International journal of molecular sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094095

Vancouver

Litus EA, Shevelyova MP, Vologzhannikova AA, Deryusheva EI, Chaplygina AV, Rastrygina VA, et al. Interaction Between Glucagon-like Peptide 1 and Its Analogs with Amyloid-β Peptide Affects Its Fibrillation and Cytotoxicity. International journal of molecular sciences. 2025. doi:10.3390/ijms26094095. PMID: 40362335.

BibTeX

@article{litus2025-40362335,
  author  = {Litus, E. A. and Shevelyova, M. P. and Vologzhannikova, A. A. and Deryusheva, E. I. and Chaplygina, A. V. and Rastrygina, V. A. and Machulin, A. V. and Alikova, V. D. and others},
  title   = {{Interaction Between Glucagon-like Peptide 1 and Its Analogs with Amyloid-β Peptide Affects Its Fibrillation and Cytotoxicity}},
  journal = {International journal of molecular sciences},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3390/ijms26094095},
  pmid    = {40362335},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094095}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 26 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 45 of 100. Total 45 of 100.26 of the 58 points we could judge = 45 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International journal of molecular sciences)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40362335)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 26 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100.
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “cytotoxicity”

2 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cytotoxicity”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 2 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →