Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

During follow-up 20 SCD and 99 MCI patients developed dementia. For MCI patients who progressed to any form of dementia, plasma GFAP contributed on top of age, sex, and MMSE score in the parsimonious individualized prognostic model (C-index = 0.69 [95%CI = 0.63; 0.76]). With AD-dementia as the outcome, GFAP and pTau181 were selected in the parsimonious model on top of the demographic variables (C-index = 0.71 [95%CI = 0.65; 0.76]). In the subset of 197 MCI individuals with pTau217 measurements, pTau217 was selected in the parsimonious model on top of the demographic variables (C-index = 0.75 [95%CI = 0.69; 0.79]). External validation demonstrated that the models are robust in a memory clinic setting. Our prediction models have utility for clinical practice to calculate progression probabilities for development of dementia in individual patients living with MCI over a 1-, 3- and 5-year time period.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Honey, M. I. J., van Maurik, I. S., van Harten, A. C., Gouda, M., van Leeuwenstijn, M. S. S. A., Mank, A., et al. (2025). Individualized prediction of clinical progression to dementia using plasma biomarkers in non-demented elderly. Alzheimer s Research & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01925-1

Vancouver

Honey MIJ, van Maurik IS, van Harten AC, Gouda M, van Leeuwenstijn MSSA, Mank A, et al. Individualized prediction of clinical progression to dementia using plasma biomarkers in non-demented elderly. Alzheimer s Research & Therapy. 2025. doi:10.1186/s13195-025-01925-1. PMID: 41339948.

BibTeX

@article{honey2025-41339948,
  author  = {Honey, Madison I. J. and van Maurik, Ingrid S. and van Harten, Argonde C. and Gouda, Mariam and van Leeuwenstijn, Mardou S. S. A. and Mank, Arenda and Trieu, Calvin and Bouteloup, Vincent and others},
  title   = {{Individualized prediction of clinical progression to dementia using plasma biomarkers in non-demented elderly}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s Research \& Therapy},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1186/s13195-025-01925-1},
  pmid    = {41339948},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01925-1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In non-demented elderly people, plasma GFAP, pTau181, and pTau217 improved individualized prediction of progression from MCI to dementia on top of age, sex, and MMSE, with models validated in a memory clinic setting. These models can estimate progression probabilities over 1, 3, and 5 years, but they are prognostic tools, not treatments, cures, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 46 of 100.46 of 100 points earned54 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s Research & Therapy)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Alzheimer s Research & Therapy: journal h-index 146 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 184 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Inge M.W. Verberk: h-index 30 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Inserm: institution h-index 1,988 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 15 institution(s) in 4 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41339948)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 25.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Also tagged “cerebrospinal”

820 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebrospinal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 820 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →