Home › Research › End-of-life care
Improving end-of-life care for people with dementia
Sampson EL, Burns A, Richards M.. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2011-11-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Plain-language summary
One in three adults over the age of 60 years will die with dementia. Most will have complex physical and psychological needs. Despite this, many people with dementia receive poor-quality end-of-life care. Recent government strategies have highlighted the importance of improved coordination and provision of services.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Sampson, E. L., Burns, A., & Richards, M. (2011). Improving end-of-life care for people with dementia. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.111.097030
Vancouver
Sampson EL, Burns A, Richards M. Improving end-of-life care for people with dementia. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. 2011. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.097030. PMID: 22045942.
BibTeX
@article{sampson2011-22045942,
author = {Sampson, E. L. and Burns, A. and Richards, M.},
title = {{Improving end-of-life care for people with dementia}},
journal = {The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science},
year = {2011},
doi = {10.1192/bjp.bp.111.097030},
pmid = {22045942},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.111.097030}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- One in three adults over the age of 60 years will die with dementia.
- Most will have complex physical and psychological needs.
- Despite this, many people with dementia receive poor-quality end-of-life care.
- Recent government strategies have highlighted the importance of improved coordination and provision of services.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2011 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 22045942) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in End-of-life care from nearby years
Also tagged “nursing”
995 studies in the library carry the topic tag “nursing”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 995 tagged studies.