Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 53 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Loss-of-function mutation of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 2 (TREM2) is associated with increased risks for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent animal studies reveal that the activation of peripheral TREM2 signaling may affect cerebral β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau aggregates. However, the underlying relationship between peripheral TREM2 and brain AD pathology has not yet been well-elucidated in the aging population. In this study, we collected 318 Chinese older adults with Aβ PET and plasma biomarker measures, including soluble TREM2 (sTREM2) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a proxy for astrocyte reactivity. Additionally, 129 participants underwent tau PET scans. We explored the association between plasma sTREM2, GFAP, and primary AD pathology. Plasma sTREM2 was negatively associated with reduced temporal tau PET burden in participants with abnormal Aβ and tau pathology. Higher plasma sTREM2 was related to the weaker association of Aβ pathology and plasma phosphorylated tau with tau PET increases. In contrast, elevated plasma GFAP was related to greater Aβ and tau PET burden along with stronger Aβ-related tau accumulation. Finally, higher plasma sTREM2 was linked to attenuated strength of the association between plasma GFAP and tau PET increases at both pre-defined regions of interest and voxel levels. Altogether, our findings suggest distinct relationships between plasma sTREM2 and GFAP with cerebral tau pathology, providing novel insights into the roles of peripheral TREM2 signaling and astrocytic reactivity in AD neuropathological development. This study has important implications, such as targeting the peripheral TREM2 signature, which may be a potential strategy for future AD therapies.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Lan, G., Li, A., Gonzalez-Ortiz, F., Lv, J., Ran, W., Cai, Y., et al. (2025). Higher plasma soluble TREM2 correlates with reduced cerebral tau accumulation in Alzheimer's disease. Molecular psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-02976-4

Vancouver

Lan G, Li A, Gonzalez-Ortiz F, Lv J, Ran W, Cai Y, et al. Higher plasma soluble TREM2 correlates with reduced cerebral tau accumulation in Alzheimer's disease. Molecular psychiatry. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41380-025-02976-4. PMID: 40169800.

BibTeX

@article{lan2025-40169800,
  author  = {Lan, G. and Li, A. and Gonzalez-Ortiz, F. and Lv, J. and Ran, W. and Cai, Y. and Sun, P. and Liu, L. and others},
  title   = {{Higher plasma soluble TREM2 correlates with reduced cerebral tau accumulation in Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Molecular psychiatry},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41380-025-02976-4},
  pmid    = {40169800},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-02976-4}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 53/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 31 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 53 of 100. Total 53 of 100.31 of the 58 points we could judge = 53 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 31 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 53 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Molecular psychiatry)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 129 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40169800)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 31 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 53 out of 100.
Total 53 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also in Biomarkers

224 studies in the library are filed under Biomarkers with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Biomarkers hub.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →