Home › Research › Drug development
GLP-1 Agonists in Cardiovascular Diseases: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Therapies
Yang HM.. Journal of clinical medicine, 2025-09-24
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists now serve as therapeutic agents for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) beyond their original use for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This review combines molecular mechanisms with clinical evidence to demonstrate how GLP-1 agonists help lower cardiovascular risk for conditions, including atherosclerosis, heart failure, stroke, and vascular dementia. These agents produce multiple beneficial effects, which include anti-inflammatory action along with anti-atherogenic effects, endothelial-protective benefits, and cardioprotective actions to minimize major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). GLP-1 agonists achieved substantial reductions in myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure events according to major cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs). Recent research, notably the pivotal SELECT trial, has confirmed their suitability for non-diabetic subjects with obesity and established CVD. New drug delivery methods and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) agonists demonstrate potent efficacy, with tirzepatide showing significant MACE reduction in its own CVOT. However, significant challenges related to high cost, long-term safety uncertainties, and implementation barriers remain, requiring a balanced perspective. The review presents both mechanistic data and clinical evidence to demonstrate how GLP-1 agonists function as vital cardiovascular medications and outlines future research directions to address critical evidence gaps and maximize their therapeutic effectiveness.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Yang, H. M. (2025). GLP-1 Agonists in Cardiovascular Diseases: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Therapies. Journal of clinical medicine. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196758
Vancouver
Yang HM. GLP-1 Agonists in Cardiovascular Diseases: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Therapies. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025. doi:10.3390/jcm14196758. PMID: 41095837.
BibTeX
@article{yang2025-41095837,
author = {Yang, H. M.},
title = {{GLP-1 Agonists in Cardiovascular Diseases: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Therapies}},
journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.3390/jcm14196758},
pmid = {41095837},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196758}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- New drug delivery methods and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) agonists demonstrate potent efficacy, with tirzepatide showing significant MACE reduction in its own CVOT.
- However, significant challenges related to high cost, long-term safety uncertainties, and implementation barriers remain, requiring a balanced perspective.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 45/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of clinical medicine) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41095837) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 26 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100. |
| Total | 45 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “cardiovascular”
8 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cardiovascular”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 8 tagged studies.