Home › Research › Drug development
Sex differences in risk of cardiovascular events and mortality with sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in Australians with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study
Sharma A, Wood S, Bell JS, De Blasio MJ, Ilomäki J, Ritchie RH.. The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023-01-31
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Plain-language summary
Background Sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Despite known sex differences in diabetes-induced cardiovascular disease (CVD), pharmacological treatment recommendations are independent of sex. Our objective was to investigate possible sex differences in rates of MACE with SGLT2i vs. GLP-1RA use. Methods This population-based cohort study included men and women with T2D (≥30 years), discharged from a Victorian hospital between 1st July 2013 and 1st July 2017, and dispensed an SGLT2i or GLP-1RA within 60 days of discharge. Using Cox proportional hazards regression with competing risks, subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for MACE in a follow-up to 30th June 2018. Analyses were conducted for men and women, and subgroups based on age, baseline heart failure (HF), and atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) status. Findings From a total of 8026 people (44.3% women, median follow-up time = 756 days), SGLT2i (n = 4231), compared to GLP-1RAs (n = 3795), reduced MACE rates in men (sHR 0.78; 95%CI 0.66-0.93), but not women. SGLT2i reduced MACE rates in men (sHR 0.72; 95%CI 0.54-0.98) and women (sHR 0.52; 95%CI 0.31-0.86) ≥65 years; in men with baseline HF (sHR 0.45; 95%CI 0.28-0.73); and in women with ASCVD (sHR 0.36; 95%CI 0.18-0.71). Interpretations SGLT2i, relative to GLP-1RAs, demonstrate favourable effects for MACE reductions among older Australian men and women with T2D. Analogous benefits were also observed in men with HF and women with ASCVD. Funding Dementia Australia Yulgilbar Innovation Award.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Sharma, A., Wood, S., Bell, J. S., De Blasio, M. J., Ilomäki, J., & Ritchie, R. H. (2023). Sex differences in risk of cardiovascular events and mortality with sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in Australians with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100692
Vancouver
Sharma A, Wood S, Bell JS, De Blasio MJ, Ilomäki J, Ritchie RH. Sex differences in risk of cardiovascular events and mortality with sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in Australians with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100692. PMID: 37181530.
BibTeX
@article{sharma2023-37181530,
author = {Sharma, A. and Wood, S. and Bell, J. S. and De Blasio, M. J. and Ilomäki, J. and Ritchie, R. H.},
title = {{Sex differences in risk of cardiovascular events and mortality with sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in Australians with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study}},
journal = {The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100692},
pmid = {37181530},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100692}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Findings From a total of 8026 people (44.3% women, median follow-up time = 756 days), SGLT2i (n = 4231), compared to GLP-1RAs (n = 3795), reduced MACE rates in men (sHR 0.78; 95%CI 0.66-0.93), but not women.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Study designcohort study
- Participants4,231
- Effect size44.3%; HR 0.78; HR 0.72
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 74/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 43 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 74 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A cohort study following people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 3 / 4 | 4,231 participants |
| Effect reported | 3 / 3 | Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37181530) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 43 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 43 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 74 out of 100. |
| Total | 74 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Drug development from nearby years
Also tagged “glucagon-like-peptide”
5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “glucagon-like-peptide”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.