Home › Research › Biomarkers
Fluorescent Aptasensor and Colorimetric Aptablot for p-tau231 Detection: Toward Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
Le Minh Tu Phan, Sungbo Cho. Biomedicines, 2022-01-01
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
The pathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia, is considered to be mainly driven by two major hallmarks (tau and amyloid beta). It is highly desirable to develop an affordable medicinal diagnostic that can be utilized worldwide for the early diagnosis of AD. Hence, p-tau231 was selected as a specific target, which appears both in AD serum and cerebrospinal fluid, for the development of a sensing platform for the diagnosis of AD. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first aptamer-mediated biosensors that rely on sensitive fluorescent and colorimetric aptasensors for the rapid monitoring of p-tau231. The nitrogen-doped carbon dot-based turn-on fluorescent aptasensor could rapidly analyze p-tau231 down to 3.64 ng/mL within 40 min, and the colorimetric Cu-enhanced-Au aptablot displayed high sensitivity at 4.71 pg/mL through a digital camera, with visibility to the naked eye down to 8 ng/mL p-tau231 within 140 min. Owing to their advantages, which include affordability, rapidity, high sensitivity, and dependence on complicated instruments, these aptamer-based biosensors offer significant potential for the early diagnosis of AD worldwide.
Key findings
- Owing to their advantages, which include affordability, rapidity, high sensitivity, and dependence on complicated instruments, these aptamer-based biosensors offer significant potential for the early diagnosis of AD worldwide.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 39/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Biomedicines) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 22 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100. |
| Total | 39 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Phan, L. M. T., & Cho, S. (2022). Fluorescent Aptasensor and Colorimetric Aptablot for p-tau231 Detection: Toward Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomedicines. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10010093
Vancouver
Phan LMT, Cho S. Fluorescent Aptasensor and Colorimetric Aptablot for p-tau231 Detection: Toward Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomedicines. 2022. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10010093.
BibTeX
@article{phan2022-7161ac9f,
author = {Phan, Le Minh Tu and Cho, Sungbo},
title = {{Fluorescent Aptasensor and Colorimetric Aptablot for p-tau231 Detection: Toward Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease}},
journal = {Biomedicines},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.3390/biomedicines10010093},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10010093}
}