Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

In the base-case analysis from the healthcare perspective, SoC was more clinically effective than BSC with a cost per QALY of $5211. For lecanemab versus SoC, the cost per QALY gained was $2 098 225, whereas donanemab versus lecanemab was $1 460 400. The SoC is a cost-effective pharmacological intervention for AD, offering the lowest cost per QALY gains over a 20-year period.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this cost-effectiveness analysis for Brazil, standard of care was the most cost-effective option, while lecanemab versus standard of care cost $2,098,225 per quality-adjusted life year gained and donanemab versus lecanemab cost $1,460,400. These figures concern cost and value, not whether the drugs cure or prevent Alzheimer disease.

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 41 of 100.41 of 100 points earned59 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Value in Health Regional Issues)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Value in Health Regional Issues: journal h-index 41 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 8 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 7.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 8 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira: h-index 23 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Glasgow: institution h-index 1,600 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40435868)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Price, P. U., Heggie, R., Moriguti, J. C., & Pereira, L. R. L. (2025). Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacological Therapy in Alzheimer Disease in Brazil. Value in Health Regional Issues. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101130

Vancouver

Price PU, Heggie R, Moriguti JC, Pereira LRL. Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacological Therapy in Alzheimer Disease in Brazil. Value in Health Regional Issues. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101130. PMID: 40435868.

BibTeX

@article{price2025-40435868,
  author  = {Price, Price Udo and Heggie, Robert and Moriguti, Júlio César and Pereira, Leonardo Régis Leira},
  title   = {{Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacological Therapy in Alzheimer Disease in Brazil}},
  journal = {Value in Health Regional Issues},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101130},
  pmid    = {40435868},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101130}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Treatments

Also in Treatments

166 studies in the library are filed under Treatments with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Treatments hub.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →