Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Dementia is a syndrome characterised by the development of multiple cognitive deficits and behavioural changes that significantly interfere with various aspects of life.The study aims to discuss capacity, competence and autonomy in individuals with dementia, and some ethical challenges related to these concepts, such as healthcare decision-making capacity, financial capacity, driving and voting.Secondarily, we aim to discuss a new ethical issue emerging from using artificial intelligence and machine learning to improve autonomy in individuals with dementia.Furthermore, we will discuss the ethical importance of obtaining informed consent for healthcare decision-making and Advance Care Planning in dementia patients.This study provides a comprehensive overview of the complex issues related to autonomy and competence in individuals with dementia, highlighting the importance of striking a balance between upholding individual rights and protecting the well-being of those affected by the disease.In conclusion, the study emphasizes the importance of Advance Care Planning in helping patients, families, caregivers, and healthcare professionals address ethical issues related to autonomy, capacity, and competence in dementia care.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Delineau, V. M. E. B., Duarte, I., Ferreira, A. R., & Fernandes, L. P. N. S. (2025). Ethical challenges related to capacity, competence and autonomy in individuals with dementia. Acta bioethica. https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2025000100035

Vancouver

Delineau VMEB, Duarte I, Ferreira AR, Fernandes LPNS. Ethical challenges related to capacity, competence and autonomy in individuals with dementia. Acta bioethica. 2025. doi:10.4067/s1726-569x2025000100035.

BibTeX

@article{delineau2025-8150892e,
  author  = {Delineau, Valeska Maria Eboli Bello and Duarte, Ivone and Ferreira, Ana Rita and Fernandes, Lia Paula Nogueira Sousa},
  title   = {{Ethical challenges related to capacity, competence and autonomy in individuals with dementia}},
  journal = {Acta bioethica},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.4067/s1726-569x2025000100035},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2025000100035}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper discusses ethical challenges around capacity, competence and autonomy in dementia, including healthcare decision-making, financial capacity, driving and voting, and the importance of advance care planning. It is a conceptual overview, not a study of treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 30/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 30 of 100.30 of 100 points earned70 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Acta bioethica)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Acta bioethica: journal h-index 26 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Lia Paula Nogueira Sousa Fernandes: h-index 25 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Universidade do Porto: institution h-index 646 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 30 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Related studies in End-of-life care

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →