Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 74 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Citalopram is effective in treating agitation in Alzheimer's dementia (AD), but it is associated with cognitive and cardiac risks, likely due to its R-enantiomer. Escitalopram, the S-enantiomer, may be an alternative. In this double-masked randomized (1:1) placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of escitalopram in treating agitation in AD after failure of a psychosocial intervention (PSI). Assessments occurred at enrollment, post-PSI (baseline) and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks post-baseline. Settings were 27 community-based centers. The target randomization sample was 392 participants. Participants were adults with AD, a Mini-Mental State Examination Telephone score of 3-20 and significant agitation. PSI non-responders received escitalopram (up to 15 mg per day) or placebo for 12 weeks while continuing PSI. The outcome was the proportion of participants with clinically significant improvement in agitation from baseline at 12 weeks. In total, 173 participants were randomized (84 escitalopram versus 89 placebo; mean ± s.d. age = 78.4 ± 8.7 years; 90 men (52.0%); 127 White (73.4%)). The unadjusted risk difference at 12 weeks was 0.08 (95% confidence interval: -0.21, 0.06). Drug-related QT interval prolongation was observed. Although the randomized sample was smaller than planned, escitalopram was not effective in treating agitation in AD and was associated with cardiac conduction delays. Clinicians need to be cautious in recommending escitalopram as an alternative to citalopram for this condition. ClincialTrials.gov identifier: NCT03108846 .

Key findings

Why it matters

In this trial, escitalopram was not effective in treating agitation in Alzheimer's dementia and was associated with cardiac risks. The randomized sample was smaller than planned.

Study details

Limitations

Under-enrolled (173 of a planned 392), reducing power; 12-week duration; participants had already failed a psychosocial intervention so may represent harder-to-treat agitation.

How this study scored 74/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 10 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 73 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 74 of 100. Total 74 of 100.73 of the 98 points we could judge = 74 of 100

Published in a top-tier journal, and it is a large phase 3 trial. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 73 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 74 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 10 / 10 Tier 1 — top-tier general journal (Nature Medicine)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Nature Medicine: journal h-index 763 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A large phase 3 trial
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “null-result” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 173 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 16 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 5.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 10.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 16 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Constantine George Lyketsos: h-index 130 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Johns Hopkins University: institution h-index 2,306 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 17 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40133524)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 73 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 73 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 74 out of 100.
Total 74 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Rajji, T. K., Baksh, S. N., Shade, D. M., Ismail, Z., Burhan, A. M., Okhravi, H. R., et al. (2025). Escitalopram for agitation in Alzheimer's dementia: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03569-y

Vancouver

Rajji TK, Baksh SN, Shade DM, Ismail Z, Burhan AM, Okhravi HR, et al. Escitalopram for agitation in Alzheimer's dementia: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Nature Medicine. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03569-y. PMID: 40133524.

BibTeX

@article{rajji2025-40133524,
  author  = {Rajji, T. K. and Baksh, S. N. and Shade, D. M. and Ismail, Z. and Burhan, A. M. and Okhravi, H. R. and Padala, P. R. and Rosenberg, P. B. and Schneider, L. S. and Porsteinsson, A. P. and others},
  title   = {{Escitalopram for agitation in Alzheimer's dementia: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial}},
  journal = {Nature Medicine},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41591-025-03569-y},
  pmid    = {40133524},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03569-y}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 14.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →