Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100. Prevention trials

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

This disease is associated with numerous restrictions for those affected but also for caregivers and society. Results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and conference presentations.

Key findings

Why it matters

This is a protocol for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a Chinese version of the non-pharmacological, multimodal MAKS intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia in Chinese nursing homes. No results are reported yet, so it provides no evidence about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 55/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 55 of 100.55 of 100 points earned45 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMJ Open)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 BMJ Open: journal h-index 240 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 200 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author André Kratzer: h-index 8 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg: institution h-index 901 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40306986)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 55 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Scheuermann, J.-S., Scheerbaum, P., Liu, Y., Ding, Y., Lu, J., Zhong, M., et al. (2025). SinoMAKS—protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the Chinese version of the non-pharmacological, multimodal MAKS intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia in Chinese nursing homes. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093618

Vancouver

Scheuermann J.-S, Scheerbaum P, Liu Y, Ding Y, Lu J, Zhong M, et al. SinoMAKS—protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the Chinese version of the non-pharmacological, multimodal MAKS intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia in Chinese nursing homes. BMJ Open. 2025. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093618. PMID: 40306986.

BibTeX

@article{scheuermann2025-40306986,
  author  = {Scheuermann, Julia-Sophia and Scheerbaum, Petra and Liu, Yu and Ding, Yaping and Lu, Jianwen and Zhong, Ming and Su, Jian and Gefeller, Olaf and others},
  title   = {{SinoMAKS—protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the Chinese version of the non-pharmacological, multimodal MAKS intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia in Chinese nursing homes}},
  journal = {BMJ Open},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093618},
  pmid    = {40306986},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093618}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention trials

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention trials

See all studies in Prevention trials →