Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 74 out of 100. Tau biomarkers

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background and objectives Growing evidence suggests that decreased epigenetic age relative to chronological age may be protective against late-life cognitive decline and dementia, but the mechanism leading to this resilience is unknown. Results At baseline (Exam 8, 2005-2008), the sample included 2,606 participants [mean age: 66 (SD = 9) years, 55% female, mean education: 16 (SD = 3) years]. Epigenetic age measures were weakly but significantly ( p < 0.001) correlated with t-tau ( r : 0.08-0.12) and TCBV ( r : -0.05 to -0.24). All epigenetic age measures were associated with worse baseline EF (DunedinPACE: β = -0.040, 95% CI [-0.067 to -0.012], p adj = 0.01; PCPhenoAge: β = -0.036, 95% CI [-0.062 to -0.011], p adj = 0.01; PCGrimAge: β = -0.049, 95% CI [-0.080 to -0.018], p adj = 0.01). PCPhenoAge also was associated with worse baseline memory (β = -0.034, 95% CI [-0.058 to -0.010], p adj = 0.01) and language (β = -0.032, 95% CI [-0.058 to -0.006], p adj = 0.03). DunedinPACE was associated with time to MCI (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.16, 95% CI [1.04-1.30], p adj = 0.04) and all-cause dementia (HR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.10-1.54], p adj = 0.03). Epigenetic age measures were not associated with the rate of decline. Discussion Independent of t-tau and TCBV, epigenetic age measures were associated with time to MCI, AD, and all-cause dementia and baseline cognition, but not with cognitive trajectories. The results support epigenetic age measures as markers of resilience through brain reserve.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 74/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 43 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 74 of 100. Total 74 of 100.43 of the 58 points we could judge = 74 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 43 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 74 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neurology open access)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 2,606 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42828354)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 43 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 43 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 74 out of 100.
Total 74 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Dacey, R., Durape, S., Wang, M., Hwang, P. H., Gurnani, A. S., Ang, T. F. A., et al. (2026). Epigenetic Age and Resilience in the Framingham Heart Study. Neurology open access. https://doi.org/10.1212/wn9.0000000000000081

Vancouver

Dacey R, Durape S, Wang M, Hwang PH, Gurnani AS, Ang TFA, et al. Epigenetic Age and Resilience in the Framingham Heart Study. Neurology open access. 2026. doi:10.1212/wn9.0000000000000081. PMID: 42828354.

BibTeX

@article{dacey2026-42828354,
  author  = {Dacey, R. and Durape, S. and Wang, M. and Hwang, P. H. and Gurnani, A. S. and Ang, T. F. A. and Devine, S. A. and Choi, S. E. and others},
  title   = {{Epigenetic Age and Resilience in the Framingham Heart Study}},
  journal = {Neurology open access},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1212/wn9.0000000000000081},
  pmid    = {42828354},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wn9.0000000000000081}
}

Related studies in Tau biomarkers

Also in Tau biomarkers

56 studies in the library are filed under Tau biomarkers with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Tau biomarkers hub.

Similar studies

More on Tau biomarkers

See all studies in Tau biomarkers →