Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. Clinical safety

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The intervention group showed a significantly lower delirium incidence (34% versus 18%, p =0.010) and earlier detection of delirium after hospitalization (3.2 versus 2.2 days, p =0.035). Factors associated with the presence of delirium in hospitalized patients with dementia were receiving delirium management protocol (OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.16– 0.83, p =0.019) and restraints during hospitalization (OR=14.4, 95% CI=5.81– 39.1, p < 0.001). The in-hospital IT system-based delirium management intervention program is associated with reduced delirium incidence and earlier delirium detection after hospitalization. Appropriate delirium management and avoiding unnecessary restraints are important for hospitalized patients with dementia. Plain Language Summary: This study demonstrated the effectiveness of an information technology (IT) system-based delirium management intervention program to prevent delirium in medically hospitalized patients with dementia. The in-hospital IT system-based delirium management intervention program significantly reduces delirium incidence and can detect delirium significantly earlier after hospitalization. Appropriate delirium management and avoiding unnecessary restraints are important for hospitalized patients with dementia. Keywords: delirium prevention and management, information technology, dementia, case management, hospitalization

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Wang, S.-C., Wang, W., Chang, M., Tung, Y., & Jhang, K.-M. (2025). Effectiveness of the In-Hospital Information Technology System-Based Delirium Management Intervention Program in Medically Hospitalized Patients with Dementia: A Retrospective Case–Control Study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s542781

Vancouver

Wang S.-C, Wang W, Chang M, Tung Y, Jhang K.-M. Effectiveness of the In-Hospital Information Technology System-Based Delirium Management Intervention Program in Medically Hospitalized Patients with Dementia: A Retrospective Case–Control Study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2025. doi:10.2147/jmdh.s542781. PMID: 41127385.

BibTeX

@article{wang2025-41127385,
  author  = {Wang, Sin-Chen and Wang, Wenfu and Chang, Ming‐Che and Tung, Yu‐Chun and Jhang, Kai-Ming},
  title   = {{Effectiveness of the In-Hospital Information Technology System-Based Delirium Management Intervention Program in Medically Hospitalized Patients with Dementia: A Retrospective Case–Control Study}},
  journal = {Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.2147/jmdh.s542781},
  pmid    = {41127385},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s542781}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This retrospective case-control study found that an in-hospital IT system-based delirium management programme was associated with lower delirium incidence and earlier detection in medically hospitalised patients with dementia. Receiving the delirium management protocol and avoiding restraints were both associated with delirium presence.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 39 of 100.39 of 100 points earned61 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare: journal h-index 78 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 101 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Kai-Ming Jhang: h-index 12 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Taipei Medical University: institution h-index 345 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41127385)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Clinical safety

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Clinical safety

See all studies in Clinical safety →