Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 37 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Since its first description by Charcot, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has been classified as a single neurodegenerative disease involving motor neurons. More recently, however, it has become clear that ALS is pleiotropic and its phenotype could vary depending on several factors: age of onset, prevalent damage to the upper (UMN) or the lower motor neuron, body region mostly affected, progression rate and presence of non-motor symptoms, the most frequent being cognitive impairment.1 As a consequence, different phenotypes have been described.2 It remains unclear whether these presentations should be considered as distinct clinical entities or as variants of the same disease.3 More importantly, we do not know if different aetiologies justify this variability.3 Despite these uncertainties, we approach clinical trials by administering the same treatment to all patients with ALS.3 Spatial epidemiology could give some clues on aetiology by identifying clusters and subsequently seeking for causative genetic or environmental factors. Previously, we analysed the spatial distribution of a large ALS cohort in Northwestern Italy. Patients resulted to be homogeneously distributed, suggesting either that a single environmental factor was evenly distributed or that multiple factors acted on distinct subgroups, the latter being the more likely.4 Moving from the hypothesis that aetiology could vary according to phenotypes, here we performed a spatial analysis of ALS cases stratified according to their clinical presentation. Data from the Piemonte and Valle d’Aosta ALS Register were used.4 All patients with ALS diagnosed between 2007 and 2014 and who were resident in Piemonte at the time of diagnosis were included. The cluster analysis was conducted considering municipalities; …

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Vasta, R., Canosa, A., Manera, U., Di Pede, F., Cabras, S., De Marchi, F., et al. (2021). Do ecological factors influence the clinical presentation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325625

Vancouver

Vasta R, Canosa A, Manera U, Di Pede F, Cabras S, De Marchi F, et al. Do ecological factors influence the clinical presentation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2021. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2020-325625. PMID: 33563811.

BibTeX

@article{vasta2021-33563811,
  author  = {Vasta, Rosario and Canosa, Antonio and Manera, Umberto and Di Pede, Francesca and Cabras, Sara and De Marchi, Fabiola and Mazzini, Letizia and Moglia, Cristina and others},
  title   = {{Do ecological factors influence the clinical presentation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?}},
  journal = {Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery \& Psychiatry},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1136/jnnp-2020-325625},
  pmid    = {33563811},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325625}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper discusses whether ecological factors influence the clinical presentation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a different neurodegenerative disease. It does not report findings on treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 37/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 37 of 100.37 of 100 points earned63 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry: journal h-index 336 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 5 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Adriano Chiò: h-index 107 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Turin: institution h-index 903 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33563811)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 37 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “bodies”

1,017 studies in the library carry the topic tag “bodies”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,017 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →