Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 53 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Among 40,074 inpatient encounters (median age 72 years [IQR 62-82], 46.9% male, 22.7% Black, 4.6% Hispanic), the most common serious illness was heart failure (66.0%), followed by COPD (39.3%), kidney failure (12.4%), cancer (12.3%), and dementia (11.6%). The overall rate of PCC was 11.6% (95% CI 11.3%-11.9%), ranging across hospitals from 4.2% (95% CI 3.3%-5.3%) to 23.3% (95% CI 19.6%-27.4%). Patients with dementia (20.6%, 95% CI 19.4%-21.7%) and cancer (19.5%, 95% CI 18.5%-20.7%) received PCC the most, and those with kidney failure the least (8.2%, 95% CI 7.5%-9.0%). Median time to PCC after admission was 3 days (IQR 1-6); patients with heart failure, COPD, and kidney failure received PCC 1 day later at the median compared to cancer and dementia. Predictors of increased odds of receiving PCC included being Black or Asian (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.23; aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.31-2.12, respectively) and being admitted to a hospital with a higher overall rate of PCC orders (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.13). PCC was underutilized overall and varied substantially in frequency and timing across hospitals, diseases, and patient race. These findings underscore the need to implement standardized approaches to improve adherence to guideline-recommended PCC.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Moin, E. E., Bayes, B. A., Madden, V. L., Halpern, S. D., & Courtright, K. R. (2025). Disease and Race‐Based Differences in Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation in Cancer and Noncancer Serious Illnesses. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19509

Vancouver

Moin EE, Bayes BA, Madden VL, Halpern SD, Courtright KR. Disease and Race‐Based Differences in Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation in Cancer and Noncancer Serious Illnesses. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2025. doi:10.1111/jgs.19509. PMID: 40331620.

BibTeX

@article{moin2025-40331620,
  author  = {Moin, Emily E. and Bayes, Brian A. and Madden, Vanessa L. and Halpern, Scott D. and Courtright, Katherine R.},
  title   = {{Disease and Race‐Based Differences in Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation in Cancer and Noncancer Serious Illnesses}},
  journal = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1111/jgs.19509},
  pmid    = {40331620},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19509}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study of inpatient encounters found that patients with dementia and cancer received palliative care consultation the most, but that consultation was underutilised overall and varied substantially across hospitals, diseases, and patient race. It underscores the need for standardised approaches to improve adherence to guideline-recommended palliative care consultation.

Study details

How this study scored 53/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 53 of 100.53 of 100 points earned47 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size and studied in people because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: journal h-index 344 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Katherine R. Courtright: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Pennsylvania: institution h-index 1,859 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40331620)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 53 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in End-of-life care

Also tagged “delirium”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “delirium”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →