Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 52 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Background and purpose Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a cerebral small vessel disease caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene. MRI is sensitive in detecting preclinical involvement and changes over time. However, little is known about correlations between MRI metrics and clinical measures on a longitudinal scale. In this study, we assessed the role of quantitative MRI (T2-lesion volume and diffusion tensor imaging [DTI]-derived metrics) in monitoring and predicting disease progression. Methods Sixty-two CADASIL subjects were followed prospectively over a period of 26.3+/-1.2 months. Dual-echo scans, DTI scans, and clinical scales were obtained at baseline and at follow-up. T2-lesion volumes were determined quantitatively, and histograms of mean diffusivity (MD) were produced. Results At follow-up, T2-lesion volumes and MD histogram metrics had changed significantly (all P Conclusions This study establishes correlations between changes of DTI histogram metrics and clinical measures over time. DTI histograms may be used as an adjunct outcome measure in future therapeutic trials. Moreover, DTI histogram metrics predict disease progression in CADASIL.

Key findings

Why it matters

In CADASIL subjects followed over about two years, T2-lesion volumes and mean diffusivity histogram metrics changed significantly and correlated with clinical measures over time. Diffusion tensor imaging histograms may be used as an adjunct outcome measure in future therapeutic trials and may predict disease progression in CADASIL.

Study details

How this study scored 52/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 52 of 100.52 of 100 points earned48 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Stroke)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Stroke: journal h-index 455 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2005 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 141 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 6.1 citations a year over 23 year(s) since 2005
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 6.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 3 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Martin Dichgans: h-index 146 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München: institution h-index 1,224 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 16269644)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 52 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Holtmannspötter, M., Peters, N., Opherk, C., Martin, D., Herzog, J., Brückmann, H., et al. (2005). Diffusion magnetic resonance histograms as a surrogate marker and predictor of disease progression in CADASIL: a two-year follow-up study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000189696.70989.a4

Vancouver

Holtmannspötter M, Peters N, Opherk C, Martin D, Herzog J, Brückmann H, et al. Diffusion magnetic resonance histograms as a surrogate marker and predictor of disease progression in CADASIL: a two-year follow-up study. Stroke. 2005. doi:10.1161/01.str.0000189696.70989.a4. PMID: 16269644.

BibTeX

@article{holtmannspotter2005-16269644,
  author  = {Holtmannspötter, M. and Peters, N. and Opherk, C. and Martin, D. and Herzog, J. and Brückmann, H. and Sämann, P. and Gschwendtner, A. and others},
  title   = {{Diffusion magnetic resonance histograms as a surrogate marker and predictor of disease progression in CADASIL: a two-year follow-up study}},
  journal = {Stroke},
  year    = {2005},
  doi     = {10.1161/01.str.0000189696.70989.a4},
  pmid    = {16269644},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000189696.70989.a4}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →