Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

This study developed machine learning models to predict Aβ positivity in Alzheimer’s disease by integrating early-phase 18 F-Florbetaben PET and clinical data to improve diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, the study explored machine learning models to predict cognitive status from early-phase PET, maximizing the clinical utility of dual-phase imaging protocols. 176 subjects who completed dual-phase 18 F-FBB PET scanning including 38 with normal cognition, 94 with mild cognitive impairment, and 44 with dementia were enrolled. Aβ status was determined from delayed-phase 18 F-FBB PET scans (90–110 min post-injection). To develop a machine learning model for predicting Aβ positivity, we utilized early-phase PET and clinical features. From early-phase 18 F-FBB PET scans (0–10 min post-injection), we extracted brain region-specific standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) as imaging features. Various classifiers, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost, were trained and evaluated using accuracy, ROC AUC, recall, and F1 scores. Feature importance was assessed to identify key predictors, and the importance of features that most significantly influenced each model’s results was calculated. The early-phase PET alone showed moderate performance (80.56% accuracy with Random Forest), with hippocampus (importance: 0.086), isthmus of cingulate (0.051), and entorhinal (0.038) SUVR values as top predictors. The combined PET and clinical data model achieved the highest accuracy (88.89%) using Gradient Boosting, with key predictors including APOE genotype (importance: 0.2485), Medial Orbitofrontal SUVR (0.0996), and hippocampal SUVR (0.0663). In predicting cognitive status using early-phase PET, most classifiers achieved high accuracy (> 80%) and F1 scores (0.82–0.90), with Decision Tree showing the highest accuracy of 83.33%. Machine learning models combining PET and clinical data demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for Aβ positivity prediction, while early-phase PET alone showed robust performance in predicting cognitive status, highlighting the synergistic potential of multimodal data and versatile utility of early-phase PET imaging.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study developed machine learning models combining early-phase PET and clinical data to predict amyloid-beta positivity and cognitive status. It is a diagnostic approach only and does not test any treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 50/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 50 of 100.50 of 100 points earned50 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific Reports)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Scientific Reports: journal h-index 463 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 176 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 10 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 6.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 10 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Hai‐Jeon Yoon: h-index 20 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Brown University: institution h-index 1,120 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40594040)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 50 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Choi, D. H., Ahn, S. H., Chung, Y., Kim, J. S., Jeong, J. H., & Yoon, H. (2025). Machine learning model for predicting Amyloid-β positivity and cognitive status using early-phase 18F-Florbetaben PET and clinical features. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00743-7

Vancouver

Choi DH, Ahn SH, Chung Y, Kim JS, Jeong JH, Yoon H. Machine learning model for predicting Amyloid-β positivity and cognitive status using early-phase 18F-Florbetaben PET and clinical features. Scientific Reports. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-00743-7. PMID: 40594040.

BibTeX

@article{choi2025-40594040,
  author  = {Choi, Dong Hyeok and Ahn, So Hyun and Chung, Yujin and Kim, Jin Sung and Jeong, Jee Hyang and Yoon, Hai‐Jeon},
  title   = {{Machine learning model for predicting Amyloid-β positivity and cognitive status using early-phase 18F-Florbetaben PET and clinical features}},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41598-025-00743-7},
  pmid    = {40594040},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00743-7}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →