Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 44 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

weighted MRI can assess macro-structural brain atrophy, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) unveils these hidden microstructural alterations. This study explores the use of DTI data, specifically visual patterns in Fractional Anisotropy (FA), Mean Diffusivity (MD), and Radial Diffusivity (RD) maps, to characterize AD progression. This paper proposes a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) framework employing SIFT and SURF descriptors and a bag-of-words approach to build AD-specific signatures for the hippocampus region, known to be heavily affected by the disease. These signatures are extracted from MD, FA, and RD maps and used to differentiate between AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and normal controls (NC) in both multiclass and binary classification scenarios. Additionally, we investigate late fusion of visual map features for enhanced decision-making. The experiments were accomplished with a subset of participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset formed of AD patients (n = 35), Early Mild Cognitive Impairment (EMCI) (n = 6), Late Mild Cognitive Impairment (LMCI) (n = 24) and cognitively healthy elderly Normal Controls (NC) (n = 31). Promising preliminary results demonstrate the potential of the proposed system as a useful tool to capture the AD leanness with achieving accuracies of 87.5%, 87.4%, 89%, and 95.2% for MD, FA, RD, and fusion of features respectively for the multiclass system using SIFT features. Using FA features for binary discrimination achieves 97.5%. Moreover, the fusion based on the decision level model reached an accuracy of 93.3% AD/MCI, 95.7% AD/NC, and 93.3% MCI/NC (96.2 ± 3.6 MCI vs. NC, 97.5 ± 5 AD vs. NC). Furthermore, fusion of features led to a noteworthy precision boost of 96%. These findings suggest that our DTI-based CAD framework holds promise as a reliable and accurate tool for capturing AD progression, paving the way for earlier diagnosis and potentially improved patient outcomes.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study describes a computer-aided diagnosis framework using diffusion tensor imaging features to distinguish Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and normal controls. The authors describe these as promising preliminary results from a small subset of participants, and the work is about diagnosis rather than treatment.

Study details

How this study scored 44/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 44 of 100.44 of 100 points earned56 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific Reports)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Scientific Reports: journal h-index 463 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 35 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 5 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 5 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Inas A. Yassine: h-index 11 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Cairo University: institution h-index 575 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40118994)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 44 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Zayed, N. M., Eldeep, G., & Yassine, I. A. (2025). Classification method based on surf and sift features for alzheimer diagnosis using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92759-2

Vancouver

Zayed NM, Eldeep G, Yassine IA. Classification method based on surf and sift features for alzheimer diagnosis using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Scientific Reports. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-92759-2. PMID: 40118994.

BibTeX

@article{zayed2025-40118994,
  author  = {Zayed, Nourhan Mohamed and Eldeep, Ghaidaa and Yassine, Inas A.},
  title   = {{Classification method based on surf and sift features for alzheimer diagnosis using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging}},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41598-025-92759-2},
  pmid    = {40118994},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92759-2}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →