Home › Research › End-of-life care
Describing the elements of an effective dementia palliative care service
Siobhán Fox, Jonathan Drennan, Suzanne Guérin, George W. Kernohan, Aileen Murphy, Niamh O’Connor, Suzanne Timmons. BMC Palliative Care, 2025-05-22
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
The logic model and summary results explain in detail how this dementia palliative care service undertook activities relating to person-centred care, carer support, end-of-life care, accessible care, timely care, and integrated care. It maps each activity to specific outputs and outcomes, showing that dementia palliative care, when provided appropriately, can greatly improve the quality of care received by people living and dying with advanced dementia, and their families, in the community. The logic model presented may support those developing dementia palliative care services, or guide others running existing services in how to systematically present their service activities to others, and demonstrates how clinicians, policy-makers, and others involved in service planning can utilise logic models to design new services and improve existing services.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Fox, S., Drennan, J., Guérin, S., Kernohan, G. W., Murphy, A., O’Connor, N., et al. (2025). Describing the elements of an effective dementia palliative care service. BMC Palliative Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01701-w
Vancouver
Fox S, Drennan J, Guérin S, Kernohan GW, Murphy A, O’Connor N, et al. Describing the elements of an effective dementia palliative care service. BMC Palliative Care. 2025. doi:10.1186/s12904-025-01701-w. PMID: 40405229.
BibTeX
@article{fox2025-40405229,
author = {Fox, Siobhán and Drennan, Jonathan and Guérin, Suzanne and Kernohan, George W. and Murphy, Aileen and O’Connor, Niamh and Timmons, Suzanne},
title = {{Describing the elements of an effective dementia palliative care service}},
journal = {BMC Palliative Care},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1186/s12904-025-01701-w},
pmid = {40405229},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01701-w}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- The logic model and summary results explain in detail how this dementia palliative care service undertook activities relating to person-centred care, carer support, end-of-life care, accessible care, timely care, and integrated care.
- It maps each activity to specific outputs and outcomes, showing that dementia palliative care, when provided appropriately, can greatly improve the quality of care received by people living and dying with advanced dementia, and their families, in the community.
- The logic model presented may support those developing dementia palliative care services, or guide others running existing services in how to systematically present their service activities to others, and demonstrates how clinicians, policy-makers, and others involved in service planning can utilise logic models to design new services and improve existing services.
Why it matters
This article describes a logic model showing how one dementia palliative care service organised its activities and outcomes. It does not test any treatment, cure or prevention.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 32/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC Palliative Care) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | BMC Palliative Care: journal h-index 88 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 1 / 6 | Cited 0.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 2 / 4 | Last-listed author Suzanne Timmons: h-index 41 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | University College Dublin: institution h-index 681 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40405229) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 32 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1186/s12904-025-01701-w
- PubMed: 40405229
- Original source →
- Free full text: BMC Palliative Care →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Related studies in End-of-life care
Also tagged “care”
996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.