Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

People with dementia (PWD) are frequently exposed to polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use, in which the risks of medication use outweigh the benefits or the medication is not aligned with treatment goals. Appropriate deprescribing of unnecessary or potentially inappropriate medications is essential to high-quality care for PWD, to avoid iatrogenic harm and improve health and well-being for patients and their care partners. In this article, we review the risks of polypharmacy in PWD and evidence for the safety and efficacy of deprescribing in this population. Building off existing deprescribing frameworks for older adults with multimorbidity and limited life expectancy, we provide a roadmap for deprescribing in PWD that addresses the unique challenges of living dementia, including the variable disease course, high prevalence of distressing behavioral symptoms, and central role of care partners. The steps include: (1) identify potential targets for deprescribing by eliciting medication-related goals and considering tradeoffs, (2) develop a tapering plan, (3) complete additional actions that are necessary before deprescribing, and (4) provide close follow-up. Lastly, we provide evidence-based strategies for communicating with patients and their care partners about deprescribing, adapted from the FRAME tool.

Key findings

Why it matters

This article reviews the risks of polypharmacy in people with dementia and the evidence on deprescribing, and provides a roadmap for stopping unnecessary or potentially inappropriate medications. It addresses improving care and avoiding harm, not curing or preventing dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 41 of 100.41 of 100 points earned59 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Drugs & Aging)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Drugs & Aging: journal h-index 135 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 14 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 4.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 6.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 14 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Rebecca S. Boxer: h-index 31 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Johns Hopkins University: institution h-index 2,306 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40856967)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Green, A. R., Boyd, C. M., Quiles, R., Daddato, A. E., Gleason, K. S., Taylor-McPhail, T., et al. (2025). Deprescribing for People with Dementia: A Roadmap. Drugs & Aging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-025-01238-w

Vancouver

Green AR, Boyd CM, Quiles R, Daddato AE, Gleason KS, Taylor-McPhail T, et al. Deprescribing for People with Dementia: A Roadmap. Drugs & Aging. 2025. doi:10.1007/s40266-025-01238-w. PMID: 40856967.

BibTeX

@article{green2025-40856967,
  author  = {Green, Ariel R. and Boyd, Cynthia M. and Quiles, Rosalphie and Daddato, Andrea E. and Gleason, Kathy S. and Taylor-McPhail, Tobie and Wec, Aleksandra and Nothelle, Stephanie K. and others},
  title   = {{Deprescribing for People with Dementia: A Roadmap}},
  journal = {Drugs \& Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s40266-025-01238-w},
  pmid    = {40856967},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-025-01238-w}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Caregiving

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →