Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Very early in the course of the Covid-19 pandemic, it became glaringly clear that older persons were at significantly increased risk of infection, severe illness, hospitalization, intensive care and respiratory support, and death. Beyond the impacts of infection, restrictions associated with measures to mitigate community transmission, and generalized fear of interacting with others have disadvantaged older persons. This seems to have evolved from the disproportionate clinical severity of Covid-19 in older persons which has lead to its misrepresentation as a “geriatric disease,” suggesting that prevention or treatment efforts in older persons are futile as death is predetermined and it is wiser to channel resources to younger groups who have more to benefit. Building on the well-established literature describing more positive emotional experience in older persons, Carstensen showed that this age-related advantage persisted during Covid-19 (17). (18), who demonstrated that although the age advantage persisted, it was somewhat diminished, which the authors saw as compatible with the theory that the age advantage reflects avoidance of negative circumstances by older persons, a strategy that becomes more difficult in a pandemic. Assessment of the dismal experience for older residents of nursing homes during the pandemic revealed several valuable lessons (19). Although it is obvious that most, if not all, nursing homes are not designed, staffed, operated, or funded to protect residents or staff during a pandemic, data emerged to suggest that the catastrophe might have been averted. A significant aspect of the disadvantage of older nursing home residents may reflect the systemic ageism discussed above and be reflected in policy decisions to steer personal protective garments and other supports preferentially to other portions of the health care sector, perhaps reflecting the view that elderly nursing home residents were a “lost cause” and not worth the investment. Such “unpacking” of the nursing home population going forward could result in better and safer care.

Key findings

Why it matters

This commentary notes that older persons were at significantly increased risk of infection, severe illness, hospitalization and death early in the COVID-19 pandemic. It discusses the misrepresentation of COVID-19 as a geriatric disease and lessons from the experience of older nursing home residents.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 39 of 100.39 of 100 points earned61 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Journals of Gerontology Series A)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 The Journals of Gerontology Series A: journal h-index 274 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 19 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 6 year(s) since 2022
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author John W. Rowe: h-index 72 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Columbia University: institution h-index 1,824 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 35789373)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Rowe, J. W. (2022). Covid-19 and Aging: Challenges and Opportunities. The Journals of Gerontology Series A. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glac089

Vancouver

Rowe JW. Covid-19 and Aging: Challenges and Opportunities. The Journals of Gerontology Series A. 2022. doi:10.1093/gerona/glac089. PMID: 35789373.

BibTeX

@article{rowe2022-35789373,
  author  = {Rowe, John W.},
  title   = {{Covid-19 and Aging: Challenges and Opportunities}},
  journal = {The Journals of Gerontology Series A},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.1093/gerona/glac089},
  pmid    = {35789373},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glac089}
}

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →