Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

MAP-RTAP (AUC = 0.78) and pTau/Aβ42 (AUC = 0.76) were the best performing individual biomarkers. Combining C-NDI derived using C-NODDI and Aβ42/Aβ40 achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.84) and accuracy (0.84), while other combinations optimized either sensitivity (0.93) or specificity (0.88). dMRI biomarkers demonstrate comparable performance to CSF biomarkers, with notable improvements achieved when combined. This study highlights dMRI's effectiveness for enhancing early AD detection. Highlights: Advanced multishell diffusion MRI provides equivalent performance as CSF biomarkers in classifying MCICombining diffusion MRI and CSF biomarkers improves classification performanceStatistical diffusion MRI models perform best when used individually to classify MCIThe pTau/Aβ42 ratio outperforms other individual CSF biomarkers in MCI diagnosisBiophysical diffusion MRI models achieve the best performance when combined with CSF data.

Key findings

Why it matters

Advanced diffusion MRI biomarkers performed comparably to CSF biomarkers for classifying mild cognitive impairment, and combining C-NDI with Aβ42/Aβ40 achieved the highest performance with an AUC of 0.84. This is about enhancing early detection, not treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 39 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 41 of 100. Total 41 of 100.39 of the 96 points we could judge = 41 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 39 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring: journal h-index 86 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 3 / 3 National Institutes of Health: institution h-index 2,723 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40949843)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 39 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 39 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100.
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Guo, A. Y., Laporte, J. P., Singh, K., Bae, J., Bergeron, K., Rouen, A., et al. (2025). Machine learning diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment using advanced diffusion MRI and CSF biomarkers. Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70182

Vancouver

Guo AY, Laporte JP, Singh K, Bae J, Bergeron K, Rouen A, et al. Machine learning diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment using advanced diffusion MRI and CSF biomarkers. Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring. 2025. doi:10.1002/dad2.70182. PMID: 40949843.

BibTeX

@article{guo2025-40949843,
  author  = {Guo, Alexander Y. and Laporte, John P and Singh, Kavita and Bae, Jonghyun and Bergeron, Keagan and Rouen, Alexandre and Fox, Noam and Zhang, Nathan and others},
  title   = {{Machine learning diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment using advanced diffusion MRI and CSF biomarkers}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia Diagnosis Assessment \& Disease Monitoring},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/dad2.70182},
  pmid    = {40949843},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70182}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →