Home › Research › Digital health tools
Conditional Latent Diffusion for Synthetic Brain MRI in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Preprocessing-Focused Pipeline
Fallah S, Herzog NJ.. Preprints.org, 2026-08-07
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) detection from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using deep learning depends on large, labelled datasets. However, many cohorts contain only a few hundred subjects, for which standard augmentation adds very limited diversity. Latent diffusion models (LDMs) offer an alternative. The current study presents a reproducible two-stage pipeline that generates 2D coronal brain MRI conditioned on diagnosis and trained on 295 subjects from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). In the first stage, a variational autoencoder with an adversarial objective compressed 256 × 256 slices into a 32 × 32 × 8 latent space. Then, a class-conditional LDM with classifier-free guidance generated AD and cognitively normal (CN) images. A baseline and a redesigned pipeline adding MNI152 registration, anatomically guided slice selection, and increased latent capacity were compared on the same subjects. The redesigned pipeline reached a Kernel Inception Distance of 0.030 ± 0.002 and a bias-corrected Fréchet Inception Distance (FID∞) of 42.14. A classifier trained only on synthetic data achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.754 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.91), compared with 0.810 for real data. No instance memorisation was detected across 880 samples, and a control analysis exposed a 32.7-percentage-point inflation in the standard memorisation metric under unequal reference sets. The redesigned preprocessing pipeline improves synthesis quality at a small-cohort scale and offers an approach that may be transferable to other privacy-restricted medical imaging domains.
Key findings
- A classifier trained only on synthetic data achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.754 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.91), compared with 0.810 for real data.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Participants295
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 16/100
Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 32 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 20 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 32 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Preprints.org) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 4 / 10 | Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 295 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 20 / 62 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 20 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 32 out of 100. |
| Total | 32 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Fallah, S., & Herzog, N. J. (2026). Conditional Latent Diffusion for Synthetic Brain MRI in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Preprocessing-Focused Pipeline. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202608.0508.v1
Vancouver
Fallah S, Herzog NJ. Conditional Latent Diffusion for Synthetic Brain MRI in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Preprocessing-Focused Pipeline. Preprints.org. 2026. doi:10.20944/preprints202608.0508.v1.
BibTeX
@article{fallah2026-96a58ec7,
author = {Fallah, S. and Herzog, N. J.},
title = {{Conditional Latent Diffusion for Synthetic Brain MRI in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Preprocessing-Focused Pipeline}},
journal = {Preprints.org},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.20944/preprints202608.0508.v1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202608.0508.v1}
}
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also tagged “convolutional”
205 studies in the library carry the topic tag “convolutional”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 205 tagged studies.