Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 42 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objective. To screen older people and /or those with risk factors for dementia in the community to identify risk factors and possible symptoms of dementia Methods. A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among older people aged 60 years and older or aged 50 years and older with non-communicable diseases or risk factors for developing dementia. Participants were recruited from Senior Citizen Activity Centres and other areas where older people meet in the community, such as marketplaces. Participants completed a structured, self-administered questionnaire regarding self-reported dementia risk factors, cognitive symptoms, concerns regarding symptoms and a brief cognitive assessment tool (Mini-COG). This approach was piloted in the Senior Citizen Activity Centres.Results. There were 178 participants, median age 67 years with two-thirds being female. Two-thirds had hypertension and over 40% had hypercholesterolaemia. The most commonly reported symptoms were misplacing things (41.6%), visuospatial difficulties (22.7%) and forgetfulness (20.8%). Among those with symptoms, 7.3% reported worsening symptoms, 5.1% had impaired activities of daily living, and 22.5% thought they should get their cognition assessed. For the Mini-COG, 65% recalled all 3 words, while a quarter made at least one error in the clock-drawing test. Conclusions. Community-based dementia screening using a questionnaire on risk factors, cognitive symptoms and the Mini-COG was feasible and acceptable in Brunei. Despite participants being socially active, there was a surprisingly high prevalence of risk factors for dementia and symptoms of possible cognitive impairment. Further roll-out of the community screening is planned in other locations.

Key findings

Why it matters

This pilot study screened older adults in Brunei for dementia risk factors and symptoms using a brief cognitive tool. It is a small cross-sectional pilot and does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 42/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 42 of 100.42 of 100 points earned58 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics: journal h-index 12 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 178 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Asmah Husaini: h-index 4 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Universiti Brunei Darussalam: institution h-index 265 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 42 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Teo, S. P., Lei, J., Han, M., Tarif, S. M., Kassim, N., Ali, N. B., et al. (2025). Community-based dementia screening initiative in Brunei: pilot study. Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-n838

Vancouver

Teo SP, Lei J, Han M, Tarif SM, Kassim N, Ali NB, et al. Community-based dementia screening initiative in Brunei: pilot study. Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2025. doi:10.36150/2499-6564-n838.

BibTeX

@article{teo2025-fdbe5007,
  author  = {Teo, Shyh Poh and Lei, Jie and Han, Min and Tarif, Siti Munawwarah and Kassim, Norhayati and Ali, Nurul Bazilah and Husaini, Asmah},
  title   = {{Community-based dementia screening initiative in Brunei: pilot study}},
  journal = {Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.36150/2499-6564-n838},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-n838}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →