Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Understanding the patterns in determinants of survival becomes increasingly important as the population ages. Dementia is known to shorten survival as is impaired cognition. Whether this is a continuous phenomenon and independent of other explanatory variables is less clear. Objectives To examine a population-based dataset in which a measure of cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]), self-reported physical health and lifestyle variables were measured at outset, with monitoring for mortality thereafter. Methods The five identical sites of the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS) were analysed, with populations in rural Cambridgeshire, Gwynedd, Newcastle, Nottingham and Oxford. Survival curves were modelled and stratified analyses carried out, with physical disease, sociodemographic variables and lifestyle variables as covariates. Results There was a strong and consistent reduction in survival probability for each decrement in MMSE. Adjustment for known confounders did not alter this pattern. Social class and education in particular had no additional effect. Self-reported health was the only other associated variable. Conclusion Cognitive function appears to be a marker of capacity for survival in the UK. Terminal decline can account for some of this. Actuarial survival provided here can give carers and service providers an idea of prognosis at given ages and levels of cognition, and provide baseline data for those planning interventions in similar groups.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this large multicentre UK study, each lower score on the Mini-Mental State Examination was linked to a strong and consistent reduction in survival, and adjustment for other factors did not change this pattern. It describes cognitive function as a marker of survival and does not test a treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 40 of 100.40 of 100 points earned60 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International journal of epidemiology)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 International Journal of Epidemiology: journal h-index 328 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2001 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 119 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 4.4 citations a year over 27 year(s) since 2001
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 3 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 5 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author A. L. Johnson: h-index 17 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute: institution h-index 737 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 11821351)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Neale, R., Brayne, C., Johnson, A. L., & Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study Writting Committee. (2001). Cognition and survival: an exploration in a large multicentre study of the population aged 65 years and over. International journal of epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.6.1383

Vancouver

Neale R, Brayne C, Johnson AL, Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study Writting Committee. Cognition and survival: an exploration in a large multicentre study of the population aged 65 years and over. International journal of epidemiology. 2001. doi:10.1093/ije/30.6.1383. PMID: 11821351.

BibTeX

@article{neale2001-11821351,
  author  = {Neale, R. and Brayne, C. and Johnson, A. L. and {Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study Writting Committee}},
  title   = {{Cognition and survival: an exploration in a large multicentre study of the population aged 65 years and over}},
  journal = {International journal of epidemiology},
  year    = {2001},
  doi     = {10.1093/ije/30.6.1383},
  pmid    = {11821351},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.6.1383}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Disparities

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →