Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 68 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Results Blood pressure fell by 21.7/10.8 mmHg in the candesartan group and by 18.5/9.2 mmHg in the control group. There were no significant differences in myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality. The proportions of patients who had a significant cognitive decline or developed dementia were not different in the two treatment groups. Conclusions In elderly hypertensive patients, a slightly more effective blood pressure reduction during candesartan-based therapy, compared with control therapy, was associated with a modest, statistically non-significant, reduction in major cardiovascular events and with a marked reduction in non-fatal stroke.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this trial of elderly hypertensive patients, blood pressure reduction with candesartan-based therapy did not significantly reduce the proportion of patients who had significant cognitive decline or developed dementia. There was a marked reduction in non-fatal stroke, but no significant difference in cognitive outcomes between treatment groups.

Study details

How this study scored 68/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 7 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 4 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 68 of 100.68 of 100 points earned32 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of hypertension)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Hypertension: journal h-index 236 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 Design recorded as “open-label trial”, which our rubric does not rank (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2003 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 3 / 4 4,964 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 2 / 2 Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 7 / 7 Cited 1,412 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 56.5 citations a year over 25 year(s) since 2003
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 78.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 4 / 6 Cited by 35 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 38 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Alberto Zanchetti: h-index 119 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Erasmus MC: institution h-index 1,321 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 9 institution(s) in 4 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12714861)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 68 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Lithell, H., Hansson, L., Skoog, I., Elmfeldt, D., Hofman, A., Olofsson, B., et al. (2003). The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial. Journal of hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200305000-00011

Vancouver

Lithell H, Hansson L, Skoog I, Elmfeldt D, Hofman A, Olofsson B, et al. The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial. Journal of hypertension. 2003. doi:10.1097/00004872-200305000-00011. PMID: 12714861.

BibTeX

@article{lithell2003-12714861,
  author  = {Lithell, H. and Hansson, L. and Skoog, I. and Elmfeldt, D. and Hofman, A. and Olofsson, B. and Trenkwalder, P. and Zanchetti, A. and others},
  title   = {{The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial}},
  journal = {Journal of hypertension},
  year    = {2003},
  doi     = {10.1097/00004872-200305000-00011},
  pmid    = {12714861},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200305000-00011}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

35 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →