Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. How common it is

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The study involved 649 individuals in the CI group, 35,076 in the HA, 16,494 in the NR, and 1,280,788 in the NHL group. The groups that received auditory rehabilitation (HA and CI groups) had a significantly reduced risk of dementia compared with the NR group, with the CI group showing the most pronounced reduction. The CI group demonstrated a lower risk of dementia than the HA group and had a similar dementia risk to the NHL group. In individuals with severe to profound hearing loss, rates of dementia were lower in CI users than in HA users. Moreover, the risk of dementia in those undergoing CI surgery is comparable to that of individuals with normal hearing.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Seo, H. W., Ryu, S., Han, S., Lee, S. H., & Chung, J. H. (2025). Cochlear Implantation Is Associated With Reduced Incidence of Dementia in Severe Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001660

Vancouver

Seo HW, Ryu S, Han S, Lee SH, Chung JH. Cochlear Implantation Is Associated With Reduced Incidence of Dementia in Severe Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing. 2025. doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001660. PMID: 40200399.

BibTeX

@article{seo2025-40200399,
  author  = {Seo, Hee Won and Ryu, Soorack and Han, Sang‐Yoon and Lee, Seung Hwan and Chung, Jae Ho},
  title   = {{Cochlear Implantation Is Associated With Reduced Incidence of Dementia in Severe Hearing Loss}},
  journal = {Ear and Hearing},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1097/aud.0000000000001660},
  pmid    = {40200399},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001660}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that cochlear implantation was associated with reduced incidence of dementia in individuals with severe to profound hearing loss, with the CI group showing a lower risk than the HA group and a similar risk to those with normal hearing. It suggests that auditory rehabilitation may play a role in reducing dementia risk.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 37 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 39 of 100. Total 39 of 100.37 of the 96 points we could judge = 39 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 37 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Ear and Hearing)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Ear and Hearing: journal h-index 171 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 649 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 5 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 5 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Hanyang University: institution h-index 548 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40200399)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 37 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 37 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100.
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in How common it is

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →