Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Lewy body dementia

Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a common cause of early-onset dementias marked by progressive declines in behavior, cognition, and/or movement. FTLD neuropathologies, including TDP-43 proteinopathies and primary tauopathies, do not have reliable fluid biomarkers for in-vivo diagnosis nor biomarkers that directly correspond to FTLD clinical features. Fluid biomarkers that forecast and track FTLD clinical progression, irrespective of pathology or clinical syndrome, are urgently needed to improve clinical trial designs. We previously identified the ratio between two cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) synaptic proteins, YWHAG and NPTX2, as a prognostic biomarker of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), independent of core AD pathologies, amyloid and tau. Here, we evaluate its utility in sporadic and familial FTLD compared to other neurodegenerative diseases. Using CSF assays from four independent cohorts (UCSF-MAC, ALLFTD, GENFI, PDBP), we find CSF YWHAG:NPTX2 is substantially elevated across all sporadic and familial FTLD syndromes, AD, and dementia with Lewy bodies. CSF YWHAG:NPTX2 robustly correlates with clinical severity across sporadic and familial FTLD ( C9orf72 , GRN , or MAPT mutations), independent of current gold-standard neurodegeneration biomarker neurofilament light (NfL). In presymptomatic familial FTLD, CSF YWHAG:NPTX2 is estimated to rise roughly a decade before symptom onset and improves prediction of imminent symptomatic conversion by 1.7-fold compared to plasma NfL alone, more than halving the estimated sample size required for an FTLD prevention clinical trial. These findings underscore CSF YWHAG:NPTX2 as a cross-dementia synaptic biomarker of cognitive decline and a promising biomarker for disease staging and prognosis across the clinico-pathological continuum of FTLD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Oh, H. S., Downer, J. D., Dietz, C. D., Yballa, C., Marcora, E., Lario-Lago, A., et al. (2026). Cerebrospinal fluid YWHAG:NPTX2 ratio predicts clinical severity and future phenoconversion in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.22.746470

Vancouver

Oh HS, Downer JD, Dietz CD, Yballa C, Marcora E, Lario-Lago A, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid YWHAG:NPTX2 ratio predicts clinical severity and future phenoconversion in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. bioRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.08.22.746470.

BibTeX

@article{oh2026-4579e717,
  author  = {Oh, H. S. and Downer, J. D. and Dietz, C. D. and Yballa, C. and Marcora, E. and Lario-Lago, A. and Heuer, H. W. and Forsberg, L. K. and others},
  title   = {{Cerebrospinal fluid YWHAG:NPTX2 ratio predicts clinical severity and future phenoconversion in frontotemporal lobar degeneration}},
  journal = {bioRxiv},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.08.22.746470},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.22.746470}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 13 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 21 of 100. Raw total 21 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 21 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (bioRxiv)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 13 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100.
Total 21 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Lewy body dementia

Also tagged “p-tau217”

692 studies in the library carry the topic tag “p-tau217”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 692 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Lewy body dementia

See all studies in Lewy body dementia →