Home › Research › Lewy body dementia
Face Processing Impairments in Dementia Syndromes: A Systematic Review
Leclerc M, Krohn V, Beaudoin M, Joubert S, Montembeault M.. PsyArXiv, 2026-09-06
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Face processing abilities are critical for social interaction, yet impairments are common across dementia syndromes and constitute a core diagnostic feature of some neurocognitive disorders. These abilities encompass multiple interrelated processes, including face perception,memory, and semantics. Until now, most existing individual dementia studies examined components of face processing in isolation, limiting an integrated understanding of how these deficits manifest. To address this gap, this systematic review examined domain- and syndrome-specific patterns of face processing impairment in dementia. Eligible studies were primary experimental studies published in English or French that assessed perceptual, memory, or semantic face- or person-processing in individuals with dementia compared with healthy controls. The search identified 99 eligible articles, encompassing 3,810 patients, 216 face-processing tasks, and 13 dementia syndromes, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), semantic dementia (SD), behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), and others. Semantic tasks were most frequently studied (49.5%), followed by perceptual (31.9%) and memory tasks (18.5%). Results revealed distinct syndrome-specific profiles. AD showed impairment spanning perceptual, memory, and semantic domains, but showed more severe memory impairment overall. SD and its variants showed largely preserved perceptual processing but pronounced semantic impairment, with right-temporal variant frontotemporal dementia (rtvFTD) showing greater difficulty with familiarity and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) showing greater difficulty with naming. BvFTD showed relatively preserved face processing. Findings for other syndromeswere limited by sparse literature. Overall, perceptual impairment tended to be accompanied by memory and semantic deficits, while semantic impairment could occur independently of perceptual dysfunction, consistent with a hierarchical, partly dissociable organization of face processing. These findings support integrating face processing assessments into clinical practice to refine differential diagnosis, track disease progression, and guide targeted, process-based interventions.
Key findings
- Eligible studies were primary experimental studies published in English or French that assessed perceptual, memory, or semantic face- or person-processing in individuals with dementia compared with healthy controls.
- Results revealed distinct syndrome-specific profiles.
- AD showed impairment spanning perceptual, memory, and semantic domains, but showed more severe memory impairment overall.
- Overall, perceptual impairment tended to be accompanied by memory and semantic deficits, while semantic impairment could occur independently of perceptual dysfunction, consistent with a hierarchical, partly dissociable organization of face processing.
- These findings support integrating face processing assessments into clinical practice to refine differential diagnosis, track disease progression, and guide targeted, process-based interventions.
Study details
- Study designsystematic review
- Participants3,810
- Effect size49.5%; 31.9%; 18.5%
- Evidence strengthHigh
How this study scored 16/100
Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 60 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 37 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 60 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (PsyArXiv) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 12 / 12 | A systematic review of all the studies on the question |
| Strength of evidence | 5 / 5 | Rated “high” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 4 / 10 | Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 3 / 4 | 3,810 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 37 / 62 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 37 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 60 out of 100. |
| Total | 60 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Leclerc, M., Krohn, V., Beaudoin, M., Joubert, S., & Montembeault, M. (2026). Face Processing Impairments in Dementia Syndromes: A Systematic Review. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9rqf7_v1
Vancouver
Leclerc M, Krohn V, Beaudoin M, Joubert S, Montembeault M. Face Processing Impairments in Dementia Syndromes: A Systematic Review. PsyArXiv. 2026. doi:10.31234/osf.io/9rqf7_v1.
BibTeX
@article{leclerc2026-1f4da695,
author = {Leclerc, M. and Krohn, V. and Beaudoin, M. and Joubert, S. and Montembeault, M.},
title = {{Face Processing Impairments in Dementia Syndromes: A Systematic Review}},
journal = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/9rqf7_v1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9rqf7_v1}
}