Home › Research › Inflammation and the immune system
C9orf72 dipeptides activate the NLRP3 inflammasome
Jack Rivers-Auty, Christopher Hoyle, Ayesha Pointer, Catherine Lawrence, Stuart Pickering-Brown, David Brough, Sarah Ryan. Brain communications, 2024-08-20
Topic: Inflammation, microglia and astrocytes
Frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are neurodegenerative diseases with considerable clinical, genetic and pathological overlap. The most common cause of both diseases is a hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9orf72. The expansion is translated to produce five toxic dipeptides, which aggregate in patient brain. Neuroinflammation is a feature of frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; however, its causes are unknown. The nod-like receptor family, pyrin domain-containing 3 inflammasome is implicated in several other neurodegenerative diseases as a driver of damaging inflammation. The inflammasome is a multi-protein complex which forms in immune cells in response to tissue damage, pathogens or aggregating proteins. Inflammasome activation is observed in models of other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, and inflammasome inhibition rescues cognitive decline in rodent models of Alzheimer's disease. Here, we show that a dipeptide arising from the C9orf72 expansion, poly-glycine-arginine, activated the inflammasome in microglia and macrophages, leading to secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-1β. Poly-glycine-arginine also activated the inflammasome in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures, and immunofluorescence imaging demonstrated formation of inflammasome specks in response to poly-glycine-arginine. Several clinically available anti-inflammatory drugs rescued poly-glycine-arginine-induced inflammasome activation. These data suggest that C9orf72 dipeptides contribute to the neuroinflammation observed in patients, and highlight the inflammasome as a potential therapeutic target for frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Rivers-Auty, J., Hoyle, C., Pointer, A., Lawrence, C., Pickering-Brown, S., Brough, D., et al. (2024). C9orf72 dipeptides activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. Brain communications. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae282
Vancouver
Rivers-Auty J, Hoyle C, Pointer A, Lawrence C, Pickering-Brown S, Brough D, et al. C9orf72 dipeptides activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. Brain communications. 2024. doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcae282. PMID: 39229486.
BibTeX
@article{riversauty2024-39229486,
author = {Rivers-Auty, Jack and Hoyle, Christopher and Pointer, Ayesha and Lawrence, Catherine and Pickering-Brown, Stuart and Brough, David and Ryan, Sarah},
title = {{C9orf72 dipeptides activate the NLRP3 inflammasome}},
journal = {Brain communications},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1093/braincomms/fcae282},
pmid = {39229486},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae282}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Poly-glycine-arginine also activated the inflammasome in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures, and immunofluorescence imaging demonstrated formation of inflammasome specks in response to poly-glycine-arginine.
- These data suggest that C9orf72 dipeptides contribute to the neuroinflammation observed in patients, and highlight the inflammasome as a potential therapeutic target for frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 46/100
Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 46 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Brain communications) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39229486) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 26 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 46 out of 100. |
| Total | 46 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Inflammation and the immune system
Also tagged “inflammasome”
384 studies in the library carry the topic tag “inflammasome”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 384 tagged studies.